Matrimonial Home Rights: Supreme Court Directs Accommodation in Redeveloped Property in Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (27 April 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Deepak Gupta, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 with Section 18, Judges, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 with Section 177, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 with Section 2(25), Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 with Section 95-A, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 with Section 19, Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 with Section 2(s), Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 with Section 3(iv)

Supreme Court Directs Accommodation for Wife in Matrimonial Dispute: Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a wife can enforce her right to reside in her matrimonial home through a writ petition, especially when the original home was part of a redevelopment project under the Maharashtra Housing and […]

Matrimonial Home Rights: Supreme Court Directs Accommodation in Redeveloped Property in Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar vs. Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority (27 April 2020) Read Post »