Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981

Supreme Court quashes detention order under MPDA Act for bootlegging: Arjun vs. State of Maharashtra (2024) INSC 968 (11 December 2024)

Supreme Court quashes detention order under MPDA Act for bootlegging: Arjun vs. State of Maharashtra (2024) INSC 968 (11 December 2024) Date of the Judgment: 11 December 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 968 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., K. V. Viswanathan, J. Can a person be detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 (MPDA […]

Supreme Court quashes detention order under MPDA Act for bootlegging: Arjun vs. State of Maharashtra (2024) INSC 968 (11 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Period Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Balu Waman Patole (2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Period Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Balu Waman Patole (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the detaining authority is required to specify the period of detention in the detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. CASE TYPE: Preventive Detention Law Case Name: State

Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Period Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Balu Waman Patole (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes detention order for not specifying detention period: Lahu Shrirang Gatkal vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, must specify the period of detention. CASE TYPE: Preventive Detention Law Case Name: Lahu Shrirang Gatkal vs. State of Maharashtra Judgment Date: July 17, 2017 Introduction Can a preventive detention order be valid if it does not specify the period

Supreme Court quashes detention order for not specifying detention period: Lahu Shrirang Gatkal vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top