Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 with Section 3

Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Period Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Balu Waman Patole (2019)

/ Indira Banerjee, Judges, M. R. Shah, Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 with Section 13, Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 with Section 3

Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Period Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Balu Waman Patole (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the detaining authority is required to specify the period of detention in the detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. CASE TYPE: Preventive Detention Law Case Name: State […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Detention Period Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act: State of Maharashtra vs. Balu Waman Patole (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes detention order for not specifying detention period: Lahu Shrirang Gatkal vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

/ Detention Order, Detention Period, Individual Liberties, Judges, Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 with Section 3, N.V. Ramana, Prafulla C. Pant, Preventive Detention

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a detention order under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981, must specify the period of detention. CASE TYPE: Preventive Detention Law Case Name: Lahu Shrirang Gatkal vs. State of Maharashtra Judgment Date: July 17, 2017 Introduction Can a preventive detention order be valid if it does not specify the period

Supreme Court quashes detention order for not specifying detention period: Lahu Shrirang Gatkal vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top