Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971

Supreme Court Upholds Slum Rehabilitation Authority’s Power: Kantabai Vasant Ahir vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2019)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971, Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971 with Section 12, Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971 with Section 4, Slum Rehabilitation Authority

Supreme Court Upholds Slum Rehabilitation Authority’s Power: Kantabai Vasant Ahir vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior notification under Section 4 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971 is mandatory before initiating slum rehabilitation proceedings under Chapter I-A of the Act. CASE TYPE: Slum Rehabilitation Law Case Name: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Slum Rehabilitation Authority’s Power: Kantabai Vasant Ahir vs. Slum Rehabilitation Authority (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Order: Kumud Salunke vs. Pandurang Gandhewar (2019)

/ Appellate Authority, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971, Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971 with Section 22, Slum Authority, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 108, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Order: Kumud Salunke vs. Pandurang Gandhewar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with the findings of the Appellate Authority under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Re-development) Act, 1971, when the Appellate Authority has considered the requirements of Section 22(4) of the Act. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Order: Kumud Salunke vs. Pandurang Gandhewar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Commissioner’s Authority, Sets Aside High Court’s Remarks in Liquor License Case (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Administrative Law, Appellate Authority, Bias, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Judicial Review, Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 with Section 23, Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 with Section 24, Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 with Section 54

Supreme Court Upholds Commissioner’s Authority, Sets Aside High Court’s Remarks in Liquor License Case (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can pass adverse remarks against an appellate authority and issue anticipatory directions in a matter related to liquor licenses. CASE TYPE: Excise Law, Administrative Law Case Name: Manish S. Pardasani (M/s Wine Kornder) etc.

Supreme Court Upholds Commissioner’s Authority, Sets Aside High Court’s Remarks in Liquor License Case (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top