Standard of Proof

Supreme Court Upholds Stridhan Rights: Maya Gopinathan vs. Anoop S.B. (2024) INSC 334

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 406, Matrimonial Law, Standard of Proof, Stridhan

Supreme Court Upholds Stridhan Rights: Maya Gopinathan vs. Anoop S.B. (2024) INSC 334 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in reversing the Family Court’s decision regarding the misappropriation of stridhan (woman’s property) and the standard of proof required in such cases. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Maya Gopinathan vs. Anoop S.B. & Anr. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Stridhan Rights: Maya Gopinathan vs. Anoop S.B. (2024) INSC 334 Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to weak circumstantial evidence: Pritinder Singh vs State of Punjab (2023)

/ Acquittal, Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Appeals, Criminal Law, Extra-Judicial Confession, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Standard of Proof, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to weak circumstantial evidence: Pritinder Singh vs State of Punjab (2023) Date of the Judgment: July 5, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 614 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Sanjay Karol, J. The Supreme Court of India recently overturned a conviction in a murder case, highlighting the importance of

Supreme Court overturns conviction in murder case due to weak circumstantial evidence: Pritinder Singh vs State of Punjab (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction in double murder case: Basheera Begum vs. Mohammed Ibrahim (2020)

/ Circumstantial Evidence, Criminal Conspiracy, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Indira Banerjee, Judges, R. Banumathi, Standard of Proof

Supreme Court overturns conviction in double murder case: Basheera Begum vs. Mohammed Ibrahim (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in overturning the Trial Court’s conviction based on circumstantial evidence in a double murder case. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Basheera Begum vs. Mohammed Ibrahim & Ors. Judgment Date: 31 January

Supreme Court overturns conviction in double murder case: Basheera Begum vs. Mohammed Ibrahim (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Child Development Officer in Bribery Case: State of Bihar vs. Phulpari Kumari (2019)

/ Departmental Inquiry, Evidence Law, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Judicial Review, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law, Standard of Proof

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Child Development Officer in Bribery Case: State of Bihar vs. Phulpari Kumari (2019) Date of the Judgment: December 6, 2019 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and Hemant Gupta, J. Can a High Court overturn a disciplinary authority’s decision based on a departmental inquiry by re-evaluating

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Child Development Officer in Bribery Case: State of Bihar vs. Phulpari Kumari (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction of two accused in murder case: Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Amitava Roy, Criminal Appeal, Criminal Law, Evidence Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 149, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Offences Against Human Body, Standard of Proof

Supreme Court overturns conviction of two accused in murder case: Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt in a case of murder and assault. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar vs. The State of

Supreme Court overturns conviction of two accused in murder case: Latesh @ Dadu Baburao Karlekar vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top