Motor Vehicle Accident Law

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. Thakur Dwara Kalan (2023)

/ Compensation, Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 18, Land Acquisition Law with Section 4

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. Thakur Dwara Kalan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining fair compensation for land acquisition using annual cumulative increase. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: The Central Warehousing Corporation vs. Thakur Dwara Kalan Ul-Maruf Baraglan Wala (Dead) & Ors. [Judgment Date]: October 19, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: […]

Supreme Court Revises Land Compensation: Central Warehousing Corporation vs. Thakur Dwara Kalan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court restores 100% functional disability for amputated gunman in motor accident case: Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2023) INSC 606 (4 July 2023)

/ Compensation, Disability Law, Loss of Earning Capacity, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Permanent Disability

Supreme Court restores 100% functional disability for amputated gunman in motor accident case: Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2023) INSC 606 (4 July 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of functional disability in motor accident compensation cases involving amputation. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation Case Name: Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Supreme Court restores 100% functional disability for amputated gunman in motor accident case: Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2023) INSC 606 (4 July 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles functional disability assessment in motor accident claim: Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2023) INSC 597 (4 July 2023)

/ Accident Claims, Compensation, Disability Assessment, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 with Section 166, Personal Injury Law

Supreme Court Upholds 100% Functional Disability for Gunman with Amputated Leg in Motor Accident Case LEGAL ISSUE: Assessment of functional disability in motor accident claims. CASE TYPE: Motor Accident Compensation. Case Name: Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 4 July 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 4 July 2023

Supreme Court settles functional disability assessment in motor accident claim: Sarnam Singh vs. Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd. (2023) INSC 597 (4 July 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, Medical Council of India, Minimum Qualifications for Teachers in Medical Institutions Regulations, 1998, Rajesh Bindal, Reinstatement, Retroactive Application of Regulations, Service Law

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether lecturers terminated due to lack of qualifications as per later regulations are entitled to reinstatement or compensation when they were qualified at the time of their initial appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Compensation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, Rajesh Bindal, Reinstatement, Service Law, Termination of Employment

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023) Date of the Judgment: May 19, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 563 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J., Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a medical college terminate lecturers who were initially qualified but later deemed unqualified by updated regulations?

Supreme Court awards compensation to lecturers denied reinstatement: K.J. Somaiya Medical College vs. Maharashtra University of Health Sciences (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30/31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Possession, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if either possession is taken or compensation is paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 10, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1987 of 2023 (@ Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 6169 of 2023) (@ Diary No.37735 of 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T.

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: NCT of Delhi vs. Subhash Chander Khatri (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding deemed lapse of land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Land

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Land Used Without Acquisition: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Rajiv (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 136, Constitution of India with Article 142, Due Process, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Land Used Without Acquisition: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Rajiv (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a landowner is entitled to compensation when their land is used for public purposes without formal acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. vs. Rajiv and Anr. [Judgment Date]: February

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Land Used Without Acquisition: State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Rajiv (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Possession, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation is deposited in the treasury instead of being paid to

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reduces Compensation for Land Acquisition in Haryana: HSIIDC vs. Satpal (2023)

/ Compensation, Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 25, M.R. Shah, Market Value

Supreme Court Reduces Compensation for Land Acquisition in Haryana: HSIIDC vs. Satpal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of fair compensation for land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Haryana State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Others vs. Satpal & Others Etc. Etc. Judgment Date: 09 February 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 09

Supreme Court Reduces Compensation for Land Acquisition in Haryana: HSIIDC vs. Satpal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Compensation, Consumer Dispute, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Deficiency in Service, Judges, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of adequate compensation for deficiency in service in a consumer dispute. CASE TYPE: Consumer Protection. Case Name: ITC Limited vs. Aashna Roy. Judgment Date: 7th February 2023 Date of the Judgment: 7th February 2023. Citation: [Not Available in Source]. Judges:

Supreme Court Revisits Compensation in Consumer Case: ITC vs. Aashna Roy (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top