Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 50

Supreme Court Clarifies “Owner” Definition in Motor Vehicle Insurance Claims: Surendra Kumar Bhilawe vs. New India Assurance Company Limited (2020)

/ Contract Act, 1872, Contract Act, 1872 with Section 10, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 157, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 2(30), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 50, R. Banumathi, Sale of Goods Act, 1930, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 with Section 19, Sale of Goods Act, 1930 with Section 20

Supreme Court Clarifies “Owner” Definition in Motor Vehicle Insurance Claims: Surendra Kumar Bhilawe vs. New India Assurance Company Limited (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of “owner” under Section 2(30) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in the context of insurance claims. CASE TYPE: Motor Vehicle Insurance/Consumer Dispute Case Name: Surendra Kumar Bhilawe vs. The New India […]

Supreme Court Clarifies “Owner” Definition in Motor Vehicle Insurance Claims: Surendra Kumar Bhilawe vs. New India Assurance Company Limited (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Insurer Liable Despite Lack of Registration Transfer in Vehicle Theft Case: Balwant Singh & Sons vs. National Insurance Company Ltd (2019)

/ Consumer Disputes Redressal, Consumer Law, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee, Insurable Interest, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 157, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 2(30), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 50

Supreme Court Holds Insurer Liable Despite Lack of Registration Transfer in Vehicle Theft Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an insurance company is liable to pay a claim when the vehicle is stolen, even if the vehicle’s registration was not transferred to the purchaser’s name, but the insurance policy was issued to the purchaser and the premium

Supreme Court Holds Insurer Liable Despite Lack of Registration Transfer in Vehicle Theft Case: Balwant Singh & Sons vs. National Insurance Company Ltd (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Motor Vehicle Ownership in Accident Claims: Naveen Kumar vs. Vijay Kumar (2018)

/ A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 2(30), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 50

Supreme Court Clarifies Motor Vehicle Ownership in Accident Claims: Naveen Kumar vs. Vijay Kumar (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the “owner” of a motor vehicle for liability in accident claims when the vehicle has been sold but the registration remains in the seller’s name. CASE TYPE: Motor Vehicle Accident Compensation Case Name: Naveen Kumar vs. Vijay

Supreme Court Clarifies Motor Vehicle Ownership in Accident Claims: Naveen Kumar vs. Vijay Kumar (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top