Tender

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in Electric Bus Contract: Tata Motors vs. BEST (2023)

/ Contract Law, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. B. Pardiwala, Judges, Judicial Review, Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Tender, Tender Process

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in Electric Bus Contract: Tata Motors vs. BEST (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court, after disqualifying a bidder in a tender process, should further investigate the eligibility of other bidders. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Tender Process Case Name: TATA Motors Limited vs. The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport […]

Supreme Court Upholds Tender Award in Electric Bus Contract: Tata Motors vs. BEST (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court expunges High Court’s observations on tender discrimination: Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, Judges, Judicial Restraint, Judicial Review, M.R. Shah, Tender

Supreme Court expunges High Court’s observations on tender discrimination: Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can make general observations about discrimination in tender processes without deciding the case on merits. CASE TYPE: Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited &

Supreme Court expunges High Court’s observations on tender discrimination: Union of India vs. Bharat Fritz Werner Limited (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes indefinite blacklisting for misbranding: Vetindia Pharmaceuticals vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) INSC 464

/ Blacklisting, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Contract Law, Contract Law with Breach of Contract, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 with Section 9, Judges, Krishna Murari, Misbranded Drugs, Navin Sinha, Principles of Natural Justice, R.F. Nariman, Tender

Supreme Court quashes indefinite blacklisting for misbranding: Vetindia Pharmaceuticals vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) INSC 464 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an indefinite blacklisting order for a minor misbranding error, without a specific show cause notice, is valid. CASE TYPE: Contract Law/ Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: Vetindia Pharmaceuticals Limited vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another

Supreme Court quashes indefinite blacklisting for misbranding: Vetindia Pharmaceuticals vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) INSC 464 Read Post »

Scroll to Top