Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 9A Archives

Supreme Court Quashes BSF Commandant’s Conviction in Acetic Anhydride Case: B.S. Hari vs. Union of India (2023)

April 13, 2023 / Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Border Security Force Act, 1968, Border Security Force Act, 1968 with Section 40, Border Security Force Act, 1968 with Section 46, Border Security Force Act, 1968 with Section 75, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Judges, Krishna Murari, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 25, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 59(3), Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 9A

Supreme Court Quashes BSF Commandant’s Conviction in Acetic Anhydride Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a BSF Commandant can be convicted based solely on the statement of a subordinate, and whether the punishment was proportionate to the alleged offense. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal Case Name: B.S. Hari Commandant vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 13 […]

Supreme Court Quashes BSF Commandant’s Conviction in Acetic Anhydride Case: B.S. Hari vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes BSF Commandant’s conviction in NDPS case: B.S. Hari vs. Union of India (2023)

Supreme Court quashes BSF Commandant’s conviction in NDPS case: B.S. Hari vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Border Security Force (BSF) Commandant can be convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) based solely on the statement of a subordinate, and whether the punishment was proportionate to the