Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Act Case: Raveen Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (26 October 2020)

/ Admissions as Evidence, Hrishikesh Roy, Indian Evidence Act, Indian Evidence Act with Section 145, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 20, Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 42, Sentencing in NDPS Cases, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Act Case: Raveen Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020) Date of the Judgment: 26 October 2020 Citation: Not Available Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., Surya Kant, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can a High Court reverse a trial court’s acquittal in a narcotics case? The Supreme Court of India recently […]

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in NDPS Act Case: Raveen Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (26 October 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Probationary Judge: Rajasthan High Court vs. Ved Priya (2020)

/ B. R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 311, Judges, Judicial Review, Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 with Section 36(3), Probation, S. A. Bobde, Service Law, Service Law with Article 311, Surya Kant, Termination of Service

Rajasthan High Court’s Decision to Terminate Probationary Judge Upheld by Supreme Court LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the termination of a probationary judicial officer’s services was valid and not punitive. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Rajasthan High Court vs. Ved Priya & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 18 March 2020 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18 March 2020

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Probationary Judge: Rajasthan High Court vs. Ved Priya (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top