Show Cause Notice

Supreme Court quashes debarment and penalty on transformer supplier: Isolators and Isolators vs. Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Vitran Company (2023)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Contractual Penalties, Dinesh Maheshwari, Government Contracts, Judges, Natural Justice, Principles of Natural Justice, Sanjay Kumar, Show Cause Notice

Supreme Court quashes debarment and penalty on transformer supplier: Isolators and Isolators vs. Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Vitran Company (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a supplier can be debarred and penalized for non-supply of goods when the purchasing company deferred the delivery. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Public Procurement Case Name: Isolators and Isolators Through Its Proprietor Mrs. […]

Supreme Court quashes debarment and penalty on transformer supplier: Isolators and Isolators vs. Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Vitran Company (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting Order: UMC Technologies vs. Food Corporation of India (2020)

/ Administrative Law, B.R. Gavai, Blacklisting, Blacklisting, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 42.1, Judges, Principles of Natural Justice, S. Abdul Nazeer, Show Cause Notice

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting Order: UMC Technologies vs. Food Corporation of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a blacklisting order is valid if the show cause notice does not explicitly mention the intention to blacklist. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Administrative Law Case Name: UMC Technologies Private Limited vs. Food Corporation of India and Anr. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting Order: UMC Technologies vs. Food Corporation of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies appeal process in Central Excise cases: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd. (2019)

/ Adjudication Process, Central Excise Act, 1944, Central Excise Act, 1944 with Section 11A, Judges, Show Cause Notice, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court clarifies appeal process in Central Excise cases: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an internal order of the Central Excise Department, determining that it has jurisdiction to proceed with a matter, is appealable before the issuance of a show cause notice. CASE TYPE: Central Excise

Supreme Court clarifies appeal process in Central Excise cases: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Krishna Wax (P) Ltd. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs review of penalty calculation for unauthorized bandwidth use: Union of India vs. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. (2018) INSC 868

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Administrative Law, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Review of Orders, Show Cause Notice, Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), Telecom Law, Telegraph Rules, Unified Access Services License (UASL)

Supreme Court directs review of penalty calculation for unauthorized bandwidth use: Union of India vs. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. (2018) INSC 868 Date of the Judgment: 03 October 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 868 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and A.M. Khanwilkar, J. Can the government levy penalties and interest based on notifications without providing evidence

Supreme Court directs review of penalty calculation for unauthorized bandwidth use: Union of India vs. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. (2018) INSC 868 Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018)

/ Administrative Law, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Navin Sinha, Principles of Natural Justice, Right to be Heard, Service Law, Show Cause Notice, Termination of Service

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Date of the Judgment: April 2, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 266 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can an employee be terminated from service without being given a chance to explain their case? The

Supreme Court Directs Show Cause Notice Before Termination in Service Matter: Lakshmi Narain Dubey vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Excise Duty Appeal in Shikakai Powder Case: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Shanmugananda Soapnut Works (17 September 2008)

/ B. Sudershan Reddy, Central Excise Act, Excisability of Goods, Judges, Manufacturing Process, S.H. Kapadia, Show Cause Notice

Date of the Judgment: 17 September 2008 Judges: S.H. Kapadia and B. Sudershan Reddy, JJ. Can the government impose excise duty without properly examining the manufacturing process? The Supreme Court addressed this critical question in a case involving M/s. Shanmugananda Soapnut Works, a manufacturer of Shikakai powder. The court dismissed the appeal by the Commissioner

Supreme Court Dismisses Excise Duty Appeal in Shikakai Powder Case: Commissioner of Central Excise vs. M/s. Shanmugananda Soapnut Works (17 September 2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top