Violation of Natural Justice

Arbitration Process: Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Award in M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (18 November 2021)

/ Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 18, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 19, Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with Section 34, Judges, M.R. Shah, Natural Justice, Sanjiv Khanna, Violation of Natural Justice

Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator in Contract Dispute: M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an arbitral award should be set aside for violating principles of natural justice and not providing sufficient opportunity to present a case. CASE TYPE: Arbitration. Case Name: M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union […]

Arbitration Process: Supreme Court Appoints New Arbitrator After Setting Aside Ex-Parte Award in M/s. Narinder Singh and Sons vs. Union of India (18 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Due to Violation of Natural Justice: Mariamma Roy vs. Indian Bank (2008)

/ Aftab Alam, Alternative Remedy, High Court Order, Judges, Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, Tarun Chatterjee, Violation of Natural Justice, Writ Petition

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Judges: Justice Tarun Chatterjee, Justice Aftab Alam When is it acceptable for a higher court to intervene, even when other legal avenues are available? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Mariamma Roy vs. Indian Bank, focusing on the principles of natural justice. The

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Due to Violation of Natural Justice: Mariamma Roy vs. Indian Bank (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top