Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 148

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘Drawer’ under Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act: Bijay Agarwal vs. M/s Medilines (21 October 2024)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 389, Dishonour of Cheques, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 148

Supreme Court Clarifies ‘Drawer’ Definition in NI Act Appeals: Bijay Agarwal vs. M/s Medilines (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an authorized signatory of a company can be considered a ‘drawer’ of a cheque under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. CASE TYPE: Criminal Appeal (Cheque Dishonour) Case Name: Bijay Agarwal vs. M/s Medilines Judgment […]

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘Drawer’ under Section 148 of Negotiable Instruments Act: Bijay Agarwal vs. M/s Medilines (21 October 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Deposit Condition for Suspension of Sentence in NI Act Cases: Surinder Singh Deswal vs. Virender Gandhi (2020) INSC 14

/ Ashok Bhushan, Cheque Dishonor, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Judges, M.R. Shah, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 148

Supreme Court Upholds Deposit Condition for Suspension of Sentence in NI Act Cases Date of the Judgment: January 8, 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 14 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a court mandate a deposit of a portion of the compensation amount as a condition for suspending a sentence in a cheque dishonor

Supreme Court Upholds Deposit Condition for Suspension of Sentence in NI Act Cases: Surinder Singh Deswal vs. Virender Gandhi (2020) INSC 14 Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act in cheque bounce cases: G.J. Raja vs. Tejraj Surana (30 July 2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 357, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 421, Judges, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 143A, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 with Section 148, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Rules Section 143A of Negotiable Instruments Act is Prospective | G.J. Raja vs. Tejraj Surana Date of the Judgment: 30 July 2019 Citation: Criminal Appeal No. 1160 of 2019 @ SLP(Crl.)No.3342 of 2019 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Vineet Saran, J. Can an amendment to a law apply to cases that occurred

Supreme Court settles the applicability of Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act in cheque bounce cases: G.J. Raja vs. Tejraj Surana (30 July 2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top