Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 5

Supreme Court allows review petition based on leaked documents: Yashwant Sinha vs. CBI (2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Fundamental Rights, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 123, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Official Secrets Act, 1923, Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 3, Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 5, Ranjan Gogoi, Right to Information Act, 2005, Right to Information Act, 2005 with Section 8(1)(a), Right to Information Act, 2005 with Section 8(2)

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Based on Leaked Documents: Yashwant Sinha vs. CBI (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Admissibility of leaked documents in a review petition and the extent of government privilege over such documents. CASE TYPE: Criminal Review Petition Case Name: Yashwant Sinha & Ors. vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its Director & Anr. Judgment […]

Supreme Court allows review petition based on leaked documents: Yashwant Sinha vs. CBI (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Official Secrets Act Case: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Jaspal Singh (08 August 2003)

/ Doraiswamy Raju, H. K. Sema, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 10, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 30, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Judges, Official Secrets Act, 1923, Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 3, Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 5, Official Secrets Act, 1923 with Section 9

Date of the Judgment: 08 August 2003 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Doraiswamy Raju, J. and H. K. Sema, J. Can possessing a classified document, even without proof of communication to another party, be sufficient to establish guilt under the Official Secrets Act? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Official Secrets Act Case: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Jaspal Singh (08 August 2003) Read Post »

Scroll to Top