Partnership Act, 1932

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of consumer complaint by a partner against partnership firm: Annapurna B. Uppin & Ors. vs. Malsiddappa & Anr. (2024) INSC 276 (05 April 2024)

/ Consumer Law, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Deficiency in Service, Liability of Partners, Partnership Act, 1932, Partnership Law

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of consumer complaint by a partner against partnership firm: Annapurna B. Uppin & Ors. vs. Malsiddappa & Anr. (2024) INSC 276 (05 April 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a partner of a partnership firm can file a consumer complaint against the firm for deficiency in service. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: […]

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of consumer complaint by a partner against partnership firm: Annapurna B. Uppin & Ors. vs. Malsiddappa & Anr. (2024) INSC 276 (05 April 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between retirement and dissolution of a partnership firm: Guru Nanak Industries vs. Amar Singh (2020)

/ Dissolution of Partnership, Judges, Krishna Murari, N.V. Ramana, Partnership Act, 1932, Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 37, Partnership Act, 1932 with Section 48, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between retirement and dissolution of a partnership firm: Guru Nanak Industries vs. Amar Singh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the distinction between retirement of a partner and dissolution of a partnership firm. CASE TYPE: Partnership Law Case Name: Guru Nanak Industries, Faridabad and Another vs. Amar Singh (Dead) through LRS

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between retirement and dissolution of a partnership firm: Guru Nanak Industries vs. Amar Singh (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top