Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(e)

Gratuity for Teachers: Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Application of Payment of Gratuity Act in Private Schools (29 August 2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 13A, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(e), Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Gratuity for Teachers in Private Schools LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the retrospective amendment to the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, extending gratuity benefits to teachers in private educational institutions, is constitutionally valid. CASE TYPE: Labour Law/Service Law Case Name: Independent Schools’ Federation of India (Regd.) vs. Union of India and Another [Judgment […]

Gratuity for Teachers: Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Application of Payment of Gratuity Act in Private Schools (29 August 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revisits Gratuity for Teachers: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Gratuity, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Labour Law, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(e)

Supreme Court Revisits Gratuity for Teachers: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether teachers are considered “employees” eligible for gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. CASE TYPE: Labour Law/Gratuity Case Name: Birla Institute of Technology vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Judgment Date: March 7, 2019 Date

Supreme Court Revisits Gratuity for Teachers: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Stays Judgment on Gratuity Act Amendment: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(e), R. Subhash Reddy, Rehearing, Retrospective Amendment, Suo Motu Action, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Stays Judgment on Gratuity Act Amendment: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Retrospective application of the amended definition of “employee” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Gratuity Case Name: Birla Institute of Technology vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. Judgment Date: 9 January

Supreme Court Stays Judgment on Gratuity Act Amendment: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies gratuity eligibility for teachers under the Payment of Gratuity Act: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Employee Rights, Gratuity, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Labour Law, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 1(3)(c), Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(e)

Supreme Court clarifies gratuity eligibility for teachers under the Payment of Gratuity Act: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether teachers are considered “employees” under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, and thus eligible for gratuity benefits. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Birla Institute of Technology vs. The State

Supreme Court clarifies gratuity eligibility for teachers under the Payment of Gratuity Act: Birla Institute of Technology vs. State of Jharkhand (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows gratuity claim for employee with continuous service: Netram Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Continuous Service, Judges, Labour Law, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2(e), Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 2A, R. K. Agrawal, Regularization of Service

Supreme Court allows gratuity claim for employee with continuous service: Netram Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is eligible for gratuity for the entire period of service including the period as a daily wager, when the services were subsequently regularized. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Netram Sahu vs. State

Supreme Court allows gratuity claim for employee with continuous service: Netram Sahu vs. State of Chhattisgarh (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top