Pension Rules

Supreme Court clarifies pension calculation for work-charged employees in Bihar: Uday Pratap Thakur vs. State of Bihar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, Pension Rules, Rule 5(v) of the Work Charged Establishment Revised Service Conditions (Repealing) Rules, 2013, Service Law, Work-Charged Employees

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Calculation for Work-Charged Employees in Bihar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of pension benefits for work-charged employees upon regularization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Uday Pratap Thakur and Anr. vs. The State of Bihar and Ors. [Judgment Date]: April 28, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 28, 2023 Citation: 2023 […]

Supreme Court clarifies pension calculation for work-charged employees in Bihar: Uday Pratap Thakur vs. State of Bihar (2023) Read Post »

Premature Repatriation of Employee on Probation: Supreme Court Clarifies Rules in National Technical Research Organization vs. Dipti Deodhare (2023)

/ CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, Hima Kohli, Judges, Lien, M.R. Shah, Pension Rules, Pension Rules with Rule 13, Pension Rules with Rule 2, Probation, Service Law, Service Law with DOPT O.M. dated 21.07.2014

Premature Repatriation of Employee on Probation: Supreme Court Clarifies Rules LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee on probation can be prematurely repatriated to their parent department and be treated as discharged simpliciter. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: National Technical Research Organization & Others vs. Dipti Deodhare Judgment Date: 17 February 2023 Date of the Judgment:

Premature Repatriation of Employee on Probation: Supreme Court Clarifies Rules in National Technical Research Organization vs. Dipti Deodhare (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules in favor of pension benefits for former CLR worker: V. Sukumaran vs. State of Kerala (26 August 2020)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose, Calculation of Pension, Judges, Kerala Service Rules, Kerala Service Rules with Rule 11, Pension Law, Pension Rules, Rule 13, Part III of the Kerala Service Rules, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Pension Benefits for Former CLR Worker: V. Sukumaran vs. State of Kerala (2020) Date of the Judgment: 26 August 2020 Citation: V. Sukumaran v. State of Kerala & Anr., Civil Appeal No. 3984 of 2010, 2020 INSC 637 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., Ajay Rastogi, J., Aniruddha Bose, J.

Supreme Court rules in favor of pension benefits for former CLR worker: V. Sukumaran vs. State of Kerala (26 August 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies compassionate appointment policy for deceased employees: Munish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020)

/ Ajay Rastogi, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, Compassionate Appointment, D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Rule 38, CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, Service Law, Service Law with Policy of 18 January 1990

Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court clarifies policy for deceased employees | Munish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020) Date of the Judgment: May 19, 2020 Citation: Civil Appeal No 2426 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 3502 of 2019) Judges: Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice Hemant Gupta, and Justice Ajay Rastogi Can an

Supreme Court clarifies compassionate appointment policy for deceased employees: Munish Kumar vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between Resignation and Voluntary Retirement in Pension Cases: BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. vs. Ghanshyam Chand Sharma (2019) INSC 974 (5 December 2019)

/ Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 26, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Pension Rules, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between Resignation and Voluntary Retirement in Pension Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s resignation can be reclassified as voluntary retirement to grant pensionary benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. vs. Ghanshyam Chand Sharma & Anr. Judgment Date: 5 December 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between Resignation and Voluntary Retirement in Pension Cases: BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. vs. Ghanshyam Chand Sharma (2019) INSC 974 (5 December 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pension Benefit by Combining Gramin Dak Sevak Service with Regular Postal Service: Union of India & Ors. vs. Gandiba Behera (08 November 2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 311, Deepak Gupta, Gramin Dak Sevak, Judges, Pension Rules, Ranjan Gogoi, Service Law

Date of the Judgment: 08 November 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 1122 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, CJI, Deepak Gupta J., Aniruddha Bose J. Can prior service as a Gramin Dak Sevak (GDS) be combined with regular postal service to meet pension eligibility? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a batch of appeals, ultimately

Supreme Court Denies Pension Benefit by Combining Gramin Dak Sevak Service with Regular Postal Service: Union of India & Ors. vs. Gandiba Behera (08 November 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) INSC 217 (15 March 2019)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pension Law, Pension Rules, Pension Schemes, Ranjan Gogoi, Resignation, Retirement, Retirement Benefits, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Rules

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation Date of the Judgment: 15 March 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 217 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, CJI, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J, K.M. Joseph, J. Can an employee who resigned before a pension scheme was implemented, but after the date from which the scheme was made retrospectively

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) INSC 217 (15 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for resigned employees in service matters: Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pension Law, Pension Law with Retrospective effect, Pension Rules, Ranjan Gogoi, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Law with Resignation, Service Law with Retirement, Termination of Service

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Eligibility for Resigned Employees: LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) Date of the Judgment: March 15, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 224 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, CJI, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can employees who resigned before a pension scheme was officially implemented, but after the date from which the scheme

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for resigned employees in service matters: Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies rules on interest for delayed Commuted Value of Pension (CVP) in BSNL Employee Case: Chief General Manager Gujarat Telecom Circle vs. Manilal Ambalal Patel (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Commutation of Pension, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pension Rules, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Interest on Commuted Value of Pension (CVP) in BSNL Employee Case Date of the Judgment: March 8, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 186 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can a government employee claim interest on delayed payment of Commuted Value of Pension (CVP)? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question

Supreme Court clarifies rules on interest for delayed Commuted Value of Pension (CVP) in BSNL Employee Case: Chief General Manager Gujarat Telecom Circle vs. Manilal Ambalal Patel (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top