Police Act, 1861 with Section 30

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023)

/ Chennai City Police Act, 1888, Chennai City Police Act, 1888 with Section 41, Chennai City Police Act, 1888 with Section 41A, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Police Act, 1861, Police Act, 1861 with Section 30, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can modify its original order in a contempt petition after disposing of the main writ petition and review applications. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: K. Phanindra Reddy, I.A.S. and Ors. vs. G. Subramanian […]

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023)

/ Chennai City Police Act, 1888, Chennai City Police Act, 1888 with Section 41, Chennai City Police Act, 1888 with Section 41A, Constitutional Law, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Police Act, 1861, Police Act, 1861 with Section 30, Right to Assembly, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can modify its original order in a contempt petition. Also, whether the State can deny permission for a procession based on law and order concerns. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: K. Phanindra Reddy,

Supreme Court Upholds Right to Procession, Dismisses State’s Appeal: K. Phanindra Reddy vs. G. Subramanian (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top