Power Purchase Agreement

Supreme Court Clarifies “Change in Law” in Power Purchase Agreements: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. Adani Power Rajasthan Limited (2020)

/ Arun Mishra, Change in Law Clause, Contract Law, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 63, Judges, M.R. Shah, Power Purchase Agreement, Tariff Determination, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies “Change in Law” in Power Purchase Agreements: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. Adani Power Rajasthan Limited (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a change in domestic coal policy constitutes a “Change in Law” event under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law Case Name: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. […]

Supreme Court Clarifies “Change in Law” in Power Purchase Agreements: Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. vs. Adani Power Rajasthan Limited (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Fixed Cost Recovery in Power Purchase Agreement Disputes: Haryana Power Purchase Centre vs. Magnum Power Generation Limited (2020)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Electricity Act with Section 86(1)(f), Electricity Law, Judges, Power Purchase Agreement, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Tariff Order, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Settles Fixed Cost Recovery in Power Purchase Agreement Disputes: Haryana Power Purchase Centre vs. Magnum Power Generation Limited (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a power generator is entitled to fixed costs under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) when no power is purchased due to a tariff order. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law Case

Supreme Court settles Fixed Cost Recovery in Power Purchase Agreement Disputes: Haryana Power Purchase Centre vs. Magnum Power Generation Limited (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Restitution in Power Purchase Agreements: UHBVNL vs. Adani Power (2019)

/ Change in Law, Commercial Contracts, Contract Law, Electricity Law, Interpretation of Contracts, Judges, Navin Sinha, Power Purchase Agreement, R.F. Nariman

Supreme Court Upholds Restitution in Power Purchase Agreements: UHBVNL vs. Adani Power (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether carrying costs should be included as part of restitution under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) when there is a change in law. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law Case Name: Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Anr. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Restitution in Power Purchase Agreements: UHBVNL vs. Adani Power (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty but Reverses Contract Termination in Power Purchase Dispute

/ Contract Law, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Indian Contract Act, 1872 with Section 73, Judges, Power Purchase Agreement, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty but Reverses Contract Termination in Power Purchase Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a power purchase agreement can be terminated for delays when the agreement provides for penalties for such delays. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Power Purchase Agreement Case Name: M.P. Power Management Company Ltd. vs. Renew Clean Energy Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty but Reverses Contract Termination in Power Purchase Dispute Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination Clause in Power Purchase Agreement: Rithwik Energy vs. BESCOM (2018)

/ Contract Law, Contract Law with Estoppel, Default Notice, Electricity Act with Open Access, Electricity Law, Judges, Navin Sinha, Power Purchase Agreement, R.F. Nariman, Termination Clause

Supreme Court Upholds Termination Clause in Power Purchase Agreement: Rithwik Energy vs. BESCOM (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a notice of default under a Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) must strictly adhere to the terms of the agreement to be valid, and whether a party can be estopped from challenging a finding on a subsequent event it

Supreme Court Upholds Termination Clause in Power Purchase Agreement: Rithwik Energy vs. BESCOM (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Inherent Powers of Electricity Regulatory Commissions in Tariff Disputes: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (25 October 2017)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Electricity Act, 2003, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 62, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 64, Electricity Act, 2003 with Section 86, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Power Purchase Agreement, R. Banumathi

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission can extend the control period of a tariff order by using its inherent powers. CASE TYPE: Electricity Law, Contract Law, Regulatory Law Case Name: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (India) Private Limited and Others Judgment Date: 25 October 2017 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Limits Inherent Powers of Electricity Regulatory Commissions in Tariff Disputes: Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs. Solar Semiconductor Power Company (25 October 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top