Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Proceedings Despite Pending Criminal Case: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Rabindra Kumar Bharti (2022)

/ Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Order 41 Rule 33, Disciplinary Proceedings, Dismissal, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Service Law, Suspension

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Proceedings Despite Pending Criminal Case: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Rabindra Kumar Bharti (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether disciplinary proceedings should be stayed due to a pending criminal case involving the same charges and evidence. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Eastern Coalfields Limited & Ors. vs. Rabindra Kumar Bharti Judgment […]

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Proceedings Despite Pending Criminal Case: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Rabindra Kumar Bharti (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement in Bribery Case Despite Acquittal: State of Karnataka vs. Umesh (2022)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Judicial Review, Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957, Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984, Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 with Section 12(3), Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 with Section 7(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Service Law, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement in Bribery Case Despite Acquittal: State of Karnataka vs. Umesh (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 22, 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 1763-1764 of 2022 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and Surya Kant, J. Can a government employee be penalized for misconduct in a disciplinary proceeding even after being

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement in Bribery Case Despite Acquittal: State of Karnataka vs. Umesh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court acquits Commercial Tax Officer in bribery case: K. Shanthamma vs. State of Telangana (21 February 2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 313, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 20, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7

Supreme Court acquits Commercial Tax Officer in bribery case: K. Shanthamma vs. State of Telangana (2022) Date of the Judgment: 21 February 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 158 Judges: Ajay Rastogi, J., Abhay S. Oka, J. Can a public servant be convicted for accepting a bribe if the demand for the bribe is not clearly proven?

Supreme Court acquits Commercial Tax Officer in bribery case: K. Shanthamma vs. State of Telangana (21 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court’s quashing of criminal proceedings in Odisha land scam case (11 December 2021)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 482, Criminal Conspiracy, Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code with Section 120B, Judges, M.R. Shah, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13

Supreme Court overturns High Court’s quashing of criminal proceedings in Odisha land scam case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) by quashing criminal proceedings based on a detailed scrutiny of evidence. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. Case Name:

Supreme Court overturns High Court’s quashing of criminal proceedings in Odisha land scam case (11 December 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Bribery: Vinod Kumar Garg vs. State (27 November 2019)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 161, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 20, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Bribery Case: Vinod Kumar Garg vs. State (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the conviction of a public servant for accepting a bribe was valid despite inconsistencies in witness testimonies and challenges to the sanction order. CASE TYPE: Criminal (Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988) Case Name: Vinod Kumar Garg vs. State (Government

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Bribery: Vinod Kumar Garg vs. State (27 November 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Additional Documents in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Subrahmanyam (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Code of Criminal Procedure, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 173, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 242, Code of Criminal Procedure with Section 362, Judges, Navin Sinha, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 17

Supreme Court Allows Additional Documents in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Subrahmanyam (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can allow additional documents to be submitted after the charge sheet has been filed, especially in cases of corruption. CASE TYPE: Criminal (Prevention of Corruption Act) Case Name: State Represented by Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation

Supreme Court Allows Additional Documents in Corruption Case: CBI vs. Subrahmanyam (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top