Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d)(i)

Supreme Court Upholds Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act in Goa Power Rebate Case: Mauvin Godinho vs. State of Goa (2018) INSC 21

/ Criminal Conspiracy, Criminal Misconduct, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120-B, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d)(i), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d)(ii), S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act in Goa Power Rebate Case Date of the Judgment: January 17, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 21 Judges: N.V. Ramana, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can public officials be charged under the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly misusing their positions to grant undue benefits to private […]

Supreme Court Upholds Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act in Goa Power Rebate Case: Mauvin Godinho vs. State of Goa (2018) INSC 21 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Bribery Case: State of A.P. vs. P. Satyanarayana Murthy (2008)

/ Aftab Alam, Arijit Pasayat, Bribery, Corruption, Criminal Law, Judges, P. Sathasivam, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(d)(i), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 20

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Citation: [INSC Citation to be added when available] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can a High Court overturn a trial court’s conviction based on a differing view of evidence when a public servant is caught red-handed accepting a bribe? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Bribery Case: State of A.P. vs. P. Satyanarayana Murthy (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top