Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 4

Supreme Court Upholds CBI’s Power to Investigate Central Government Employees: CBI vs. A. Satish Kumar & Ors. (2025) INSC 11

/ Andhra Pradesh Re-Organisation Act, 2014, Andhra Pradesh Re-Organisation Act, 2014 with Section 3, C.T. Ravikumar, Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 with Section 6, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 4, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Rajesh Bindal

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) requires prior consent from a State Government to investigate central government employees for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, when the alleged offense occurs within that state. CASE TYPE: Criminal. Case Name: The State, Central Bureau of Investigation vs. A. Satish Kumar & Ors. […]

Supreme Court Upholds CBI’s Power to Investigate Central Government Employees: CBI vs. A. Satish Kumar & Ors. (2025) INSC 11 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Assam Rifles Court’s Jurisdiction in Corruption Cases: Union of India vs. Ranjit Kumar Saha (2019)

/ Assam Rifles Act, 2006, Assam Rifles Act, 2006 with Section 55, Assam Rifles Act, 2006 with Section 56, Civil Offence, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M.R. Shah, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 25, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 4

Supreme Court Upholds Assam Rifles Court’s Jurisdiction in Corruption Cases: Union of India vs. Ranjit Kumar Saha (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the General Assam Rifles Court (GARC) has the jurisdiction to try offenses under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (PC Act) against members of the Assam Rifles. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Criminal Law, Prevention

Supreme Court Upholds Assam Rifles Court’s Jurisdiction in Corruption Cases: Union of India vs. Ranjit Kumar Saha (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top