Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955

Supreme Court quashes prosecution for misbranding due to barcode availability: Raghav Gupta vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020)

/ Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 251, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 with Section 294, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Navin Sinha, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 with Rule 32(e), R.F. Nariman

Supreme Court quashes prosecution for misbranding due to barcode availability: Raghav Gupta vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) Date of the Judgment: September 4, 2020 Citation: Raghav Gupta vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) INSC 562 Judges: R.F. Nariman J., Navin Sinha J., Indira Banerjee J. Can a food product be considered misbranded if the […]

Supreme Court quashes prosecution for misbranding due to barcode availability: Raghav Gupta vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns conviction due to non-compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act: Vijendra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) INSC 752

/ A.S. Bopanna, Criminal Law, Food Adulteration, Judges, Offences and Penalties, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 with Section 10(7), Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, R. Banumathi

Supreme Court overturns conviction due to non-compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act: Vijendra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) INSC 752 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether non-compliance with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, regarding the delivery of the Public Analyst’s report to the accused, warrants the overturning of

Supreme Court overturns conviction due to non-compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act: Vijendra vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) INSC 752 Read Post »

Scroll to Top