Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case Citing Delay: V. Senthil Balaji vs. Directorate of Enforcement (26 September 2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Offences Against Property, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 4, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case Citing Delay: V. Senthil Balaji vs. Directorate of Enforcement (26 September 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether prolonged incarceration of an accused, without the likelihood of a speedy trial, violates their fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution, especially when stringent bail conditions are imposed by statutes like […]

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case Citing Delay: V. Senthil Balaji vs. Directorate of Enforcement (26 September 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail in Money Laundering Case: Satyendar Kumar Jain vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2024) INSC 217

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 109, Offence of Money Laundering, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(1)(e), Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13(2), Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail in Money Laundering Case: Satyendar Kumar Jain vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2024) INSC 217 Date of the Judgment: March 18, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 217 Judges: Bela M. Trivedi, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. Can individuals accused of money laundering be granted bail easily? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail in Money Laundering Case: Satyendar Kumar Jain vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2024) INSC 217 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: Pavana Dibbur vs. Directorate of Enforcement (29 November 2023)

/ Criminal Conspiracy, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Proceeds of Crime, Scheduled Offence

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Money Laundering Act: Pavana Dibbur vs. Directorate of Enforcement (29 November 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Scope of “proceeds of crime” and the applicability of Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) when the accused is not charged in the predicate offense. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Money Laundering

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: Pavana Dibbur vs. Directorate of Enforcement (29 November 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Money Laundering Case: Tarun Kumar vs. Directorate of Enforcement (20 November 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 439, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 24, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Money Laundering Case: Tarun Kumar vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 November 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 1006 Judges: Aniruddha Bose, J., Bela M. Trivedi, J. Can an individual accused of money laundering secure bail if they were not initially named in the FIR or early complaints?

Supreme Court Denies Bail in Money Laundering Case: Tarun Kumar vs. Directorate of Enforcement (20 November 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Bail to Manish Sisodia in Delhi Excise Policy Case: Manish Sisodia vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (30 October 2023)

/ Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 201, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Denies Bail to Manish Sisodia in Delhi Excise Policy Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether bail should be granted to an accused in a case involving allegations of corruption and money laundering, particularly concerning the generation and handling of proceeds of crime. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Prevention of Corruption, Prevention of Money Laundering Case Name:

Supreme Court Denies Bail to Manish Sisodia in Delhi Excise Policy Case: Manish Sisodia vs. Central Bureau of Investigation (30 October 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds ED’s Power to Investigate Money Laundering in Tamil Nadu Job Scam: Y. Balaji vs. Karthik Desari (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 406, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Judges, Krishna Murari, Offences related to Criminal Intimidation, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 2(1)(u), Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 50(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds ED’s Power to Investigate Money Laundering in Tamil Nadu Job Scam: Y. Balaji vs. Karthik Desari (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Enforcement Directorate (ED) can investigate money laundering based on predicate offenses of corruption. CASE TYPE: Criminal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). Case Name: Y. Balaji vs. Karthik Desari & Anr.

Supreme Court Upholds ED’s Power to Investigate Money Laundering in Tamil Nadu Job Scam: Y. Balaji vs. Karthik Desari (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in corruption cases: Y. Balaji vs. Karthik Desari & Anr. (2023) INSC 542 (16 May 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 173, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Sections 120B, 419, 420, 467, and 471, Judges, Krishna Murari, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Sections 7 and 13, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 2(1)(u), Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 2(1)(v), Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Money Laundering Act in Corruption Cases Date of the Judgment: 16 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 542 Judges: Krishna Murari, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a person be accused of money laundering if they are involved in a corruption case? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, clarifying

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act in corruption cases: Y. Balaji vs. Karthik Desari & Anr. (2023) INSC 542 (16 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Money Laundering Charges: Anoop Bartaria vs. Enforcement Directorate (21 April 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Cognizable Offence, Criminal Law, Judges, Money Laundering, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45, Proceeds of Crime

Supreme Court Upholds Money Laundering Charges: Anoop Bartaria vs. Enforcement Directorate (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the offense of money laundering under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 requires proof of knowledge of dealing with proceeds of crime. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Money Laundering. Case Name: Anoop Bartaria & Etc. vs. Dy. Director Enforcement Directorate

Supreme Court Upholds Money Laundering Charges: Anoop Bartaria vs. Enforcement Directorate (21 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Lucknow Court in Money Laundering Case: Ka Rauf Sherif vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 167(2), Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Sections 177 to 184, Judges, Money Laundering, Pankaj Mithal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 44, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Lucknow Court in Money Laundering Case: Ka Rauf Sherif vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Date of the Judgment: April 10, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 319 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J. and Pankaj Mithal, J. Can a court in Lucknow have jurisdiction over a money laundering case when the alleged criminal activities

Supreme Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Lucknow Court in Money Laundering Case: Ka Rauf Sherif vs. Directorate of Enforcement (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (24 February 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Judges, M.R. Shah, Offences under PMLA, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 to anticipatory bail applications. CASE TYPE: Criminal (Money Laundering) Case Name: The Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy & Anr. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Money Laundering Case: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (24 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of “proceeds of crime” under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in bribery cases: Directorate of Enforcement vs. Padmanabhan Kishore (31 October 2022)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 120B, Judges, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 2(1)(u), Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Proceeds of Crime, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Money Laundering Act in Bribery Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a bribe giver can be prosecuted under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) for being involved in the process or activity connected with “proceeds of crime” even before the bribe is received by the public servant. CASE TYPE: Criminal

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of “proceeds of crime” under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in bribery cases: Directorate of Enforcement vs. Padmanabhan Kishore (31 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Key Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs. Union of India (27 July 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 20, Dinesh Maheshwari, Fundamental Rights, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Judges, Money Laundering, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Upholds Key Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Date of the Judgment: 27 July 2022 Citation: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., 2022 INSC 615 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J., and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Is the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) a

Supreme Court Upholds Key Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs. Union of India (27 July 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top