Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 45 PMLA in Anticipatory Bail: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (2023)

/ Anticipatory Bail, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 438, Judges, M.R. Shah, Money Laundering, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 45 PMLA in Anticipatory Bail: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) to anticipatory bail applications under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). CASE TYPE: Criminal (Money Laundering) Case […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of Section 45 PMLA in Anticipatory Bail: Directorate of Enforcement vs. M. Gopal Reddy (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Key Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs. Union of India (27 July 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 20, Dinesh Maheshwari, Fundamental Rights, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Judges, Money Laundering, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 3, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45

Supreme Court Upholds Key Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 Date of the Judgment: 27 July 2022 Citation: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., 2022 INSC 615 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J., and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Is the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) a

Supreme Court Upholds Key Provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002: Vijay Madanlal Choudhary vs. Union of India (27 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Declares Stringent Bail Conditions Under PMLA Unconstitutional: Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India (23 November 2017)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 21, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Offence of Money Laundering, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 with Section 45, R.F. Nariman, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Can bail be denied based on the nature of a related offense, rather than the primary offense itself? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India. This case challenged the constitutional validity of Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, which imposed

Supreme Court Declares Stringent Bail Conditions Under PMLA Unconstitutional: Nikesh Tarachand Shah vs. Union of India (23 November 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top