Preventive Detention Law

Supreme Court quashes detention order due to non-supply of documents and delayed representation: Jaseela Shaji vs. Union of India (2024)

/ Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 22(5), Fundamental Rights, Preventive Detention Law

Supreme Court quashes detention order due to non-supply of documents and delayed representation: Jaseela Shaji vs. Union of India (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether non-supply of relied upon documents and delay in considering the representation of a detenu vitiates a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA). […]

Supreme Court quashes detention order due to non-supply of documents and delayed representation: Jaseela Shaji vs. Union of India (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes detention order due to illegible documents: Pramod Singla vs. Union of India (2023)

/ COFEPOSA Act, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 22, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Krishna Murari, Preventive Detention Law, Preventive Detention Law with Detention Order, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order Due to Illegible Documents: Pramod Singla vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a detention order can be quashed if the documents provided to the detainee are illegible and in a foreign language. CASE TYPE: Preventive Detention Law Case Name: Pramod Singla vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court quashes detention order due to illegible documents: Pramod Singla vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Detaining Authority’s Duty to Consider Representation in Preventive Detention Cases: Ankit Ashok Jalan vs. Union of India (2020)

/ COFEPOSA Act, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 22, Fundamental Rights, Hemant Gupta, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Preventive Detention Law, Preventive Detention Law with Section 3(1), Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Clarifies Detaining Authority’s Duty in Preventive Detention Cases (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Detaining Authority must independently consider a detainee’s representation before receiving the Advisory Board’s report. CASE TYPE: Preventive Detention Law Case Name: Ankit Ashok Jalan vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 04 March 2020 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court clarifies Detaining Authority’s Duty to Consider Representation in Preventive Detention Cases: Ankit Ashok Jalan vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top