Delay Condonation

Supreme Court Restores Review Petition in Income Tax Exemption Case: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Subros Educational Society (20 September 2021)

/ Delay Condonation, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 254, Income Tax Exemption, Judges, Procedural Law, Review Petition, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Restores Review Petition in Income Tax Exemption Case: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Subros Educational Society (20 September 2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a review petition should be restored after a delay. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Exemption. Case Name: Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) vs. Subros Educational Society. [Judgment Date]: 20 September 2021 Date […]

Supreme Court Restores Review Petition in Income Tax Exemption Case: Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Subros Educational Society (20 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases: Pattipati Venkateswarlu Naidu vs. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) (27 September 2018)

/ Civil Procedure, Compensation, Condonation of Delay, Delay Condonation, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition, Pomegranate Trees Compensation, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases (2018) Date of the Judgment: 27 September 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 879 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Can claimants receive enhanced compensation for acquired land even after a delay in approaching the court? The Supreme Court addressed this question while

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Pomegranate Trees in Land Acquisition Cases: Pattipati Venkateswarlu Naidu vs. The Special Deputy Collector (L.A.) (27 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bombay HC Order on Delay in Filing Written Statement: ATCOM Technologies Ltd. vs. Y.A. Chunawala & Co. (2018)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 1, Delay Condonation, Judges, Written Statement

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bombay HC Order on Delay in Filing Written Statement: ATCOM Technologies Ltd. vs. Y.A. Chunawala & Co. (2018) Date of the Judgment: May 7, 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 403 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J. and Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a court condone a 15-year delay in filing a written statement simply because

Supreme Court Sets Aside Bombay HC Order on Delay in Filing Written Statement: ATCOM Technologies Ltd. vs. Y.A. Chunawala & Co. (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top