Adverse Possession

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim: State of Haryana vs. Amin Lal (2024) INSC 875 (19 November 2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VIII Rule 5, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 110, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 35, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Property Law, State and Property Rights

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim Date of the Judgment: 19 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 875 Judges: Vikram Nath, J., Prasanna B. Varale, J. Can a state claim ownership of a citizen’s property through adverse possession? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in a case […]

Supreme Court Upholds Citizen’s Property Rights Against State’s Adverse Possession Claim: State of Haryana vs. Amin Lal (2024) INSC 875 (19 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Land Ownership, Property Law, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Date of the Judgment: July 08, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 467 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal Can a previous suit between a plaintiff and multiple defendants bar a subsequent suit between the co-defendants? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings Against Adverse Possession Claim: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V. Sandhya (2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Civil Law, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings Against Adverse Possession Claim: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V. Sandhya (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the plaintiff has successfully established a claim of adverse possession over the suit property. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V. Sandhya and Anr. Etc. [Judgment Date]: March 18, 2024 Date

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings Against Adverse Possession Claim: M. Radheshyamlal vs. V. Sandhya (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules on Adverse Possession in Property Dispute: Brij Narayan Shukla vs. Sudesh Kumar (2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 145, Limitation, Property Law

Supreme Court Rules on Adverse Possession in Property Dispute: Brij Narayan Shukla vs. Sudesh Kumar (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in reversing the findings of the Trial Court and First Appellate Court on the issue of adverse possession. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Brij Narayan Shukla (D) THR. LRS. vs.

Supreme Court Rules on Adverse Possession in Property Dispute: Brij Narayan Shukla vs. Sudesh Kumar (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Property Dispute Case: Sabir Hussain vs. Syed Mohammad Hassan (2023)

/ Adverse Possession, Appellate Procedure, Evidentiary Value of Documents, First Appellate Court, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Re-appreciation of Evidence, Sale Deed, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Witness Testimony

Supreme Court Remands Property Dispute Case: Sabir Hussain vs. Syed Mohammad Hassan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in reversing the Trial Court’s judgment without proper consideration of evidence in a property dispute case. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Sabir Hussain (Dead) Thr. Lrs. And Ors. vs. Syed Mohammad Hassan (Dead)

Supreme Court Remands Property Dispute Case: Sabir Hussain vs. Syed Mohammad Hassan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Property Ownership Dispute: Murti Shri Durga Bhawani Trust vs. Diwan Chand (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Adverse Possession, Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Local Commissioner's report, Evidence, Judges, Property Law, Property Law with Khasra No. 4833, Rajesh Bindal

Supreme Court Settles Property Ownership Dispute: Murti Shri Durga Bhawani Trust vs. Diwan Chand (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of property ownership and the validity of claims based on adverse possession. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute. Case Name: Murti Shri Durga Bhawani (Hetuwali) Trust & Anr. vs. Sh. Diwan Chand (Dead) through LRs & Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court Settles Property Ownership Dispute: Murti Shri Durga Bhawani Trust vs. Diwan Chand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Property Dispute: Murti Shri Durga Bhawani Trust vs. Diwan Chand (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Adverse Possession, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order XXVI, Evidence Law, Judges, Land Disputes, Property Law, Rajesh Bindal

Supreme Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Property Dispute: Murti Shri Durga Bhawani Trust vs. Diwan Chand (2023) Date of the Judgment: 11 April 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 348 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J. and Rajesh Bindal, J. Can a court deny relief to a property owner when the opposing party admits the property belongs

Supreme Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Property Dispute: Murti Shri Durga Bhawani Trust vs. Diwan Chand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Claim of Ownership Based on Conflicting Pleas of Sale Deed and Adverse Possession: Kesar Bai vs. Genda Lal (2022) INSC 1005 (14 October 2022)

/ Adverse Possession, Civil Procedure, Judges, Krishna Murari, M.R. Shah, Permanent Injunction, Property Law, Sale Deed

Supreme Court Rejects Claim of Ownership Based on Conflicting Pleas of Sale Deed and Adverse Possession Date of the Judgment: 14 October 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1005 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can a person claim ownership of a property based on both a sale deed and adverse possession simultaneously? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court Rejects Claim of Ownership Based on Conflicting Pleas of Sale Deed and Adverse Possession: Kesar Bai vs. Genda Lal (2022) INSC 1005 (14 October 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes: Mohammade Yusuf vs. Rajkumar (2020)

/ Adverse Possession, Ashok Bhushan, Compromise Decree, Immovable Property, Judges, M.R. Shah, Property Law, Registration Act, 1908, Registration Act, 1908 with Section 17, Registration of Documents

Supreme Court Clarifies Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes: Mohammade Yusuf vs. Rajkumar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a compromise decree regarding property that is the subject matter of a suit requires registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Mohammade Yusuf & Ors. vs. Rajkumar

Supreme Court Clarifies Registration Requirements for Compromise Decrees in Property Disputes: Mohammade Yusuf vs. Rajkumar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court on Adverse Possession: Uttam Chand vs. Nathu Ram (2020)

/ Adverse Possession, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Limitation Act, Limitation Act with Article 65, Property Dispute, Property Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court on Adverse Possession: Uttam Chand vs. Nathu Ram (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the defendants perfected their title by adverse possession. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Shri Uttam Chand (D) Through Lrs. vs. Nathu Ram (D) Through Lrs. & Ors. Judgment Date: 15 January 2020 Date of

Supreme Court overturns High Court on Adverse Possession: Uttam Chand vs. Nathu Ram (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Permissive Possession, Rejects Adverse Possession Claim in Property Dispute: Jit Ram vs. Satnam Singh (2019)

/ Adverse Possession, Civil Law, Judges, Permissive Possession, Permissive Possession, Property Law, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Upholds Permissive Possession, Rejects Adverse Possession Claim in Property Dispute: Jit Ram vs. Satnam Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person who has been in permissive possession of a property can claim adverse possession. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Jit Ram (deceased) through LRs. vs. Satnam Singh [Judgment Date]: 28 November

Supreme Court Upholds Permissive Possession, Rejects Adverse Possession Claim in Property Dispute: Jit Ram vs. Satnam Singh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reverses Adverse Possession Claim: Brijesh Kumar vs. Shardabai (2019)

/ Adverse Possession, Civil Law, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 with Section 115, Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 with Section 117, Navin Sinha, Property Law

Supreme Court Reverses Adverse Possession Claim: Brijesh Kumar vs. Shardabai (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the plaintiff had perfected title by adverse possession. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Brijesh Kumar and Another vs. Shardabai (Dead) By Lrs. and Others [Judgment Date]: October 1, 2019 Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2019 Citation:

Supreme Court Reverses Adverse Possession Claim: Brijesh Kumar vs. Shardabai (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top