Eviction

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act: M/S Puri Investments vs. M/S Young Friends & Co. & Ors. (23 February 2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 227, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with Section 14, Eviction, Judges, Sub-letting, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Sub-letting Under Delhi Rent Control Act: Puri Investments vs. Young Friends & Co. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 23rd February 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 1609 of 2022 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6516/2019) Judges: Justice Vineet Saran and Justice Aniruddha Bose. Can a landlord evict a tenant if […]

Supreme Court clarifies the definition of sub-letting under the Delhi Rent Control Act: M/S Puri Investments vs. M/S Young Friends & Co. & Ors. (23 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows condonation of delay in eviction case: Ambika Murali vs. Tmt. Valliamma (07 October 2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Civil Procedure, Condonation of Delay, Eviction, Ex-parte Decree, Judges, Rent Control Law

Supreme Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Eviction Case: Ambika Murali vs. Tmt. Valliamma LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a delay in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree in a rent control case can be condoned. CASE TYPE: Rent Control/Eviction Case Name: Mrs. Ambika Murali vs. Tmt. Valliamma & Anr. Judgment Date: 07 October

Supreme Court allows condonation of delay in eviction case: Ambika Murali vs. Tmt. Valliamma (07 October 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants in New Delhi Market: New Delhi Municipal Council vs. Ganga Devi & Anr. (2021) INSC 648 (27 September 2021)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Eviction, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Property Law, Transfer of Property, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants in New Delhi Market Date of the Judgment: 27 September 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 648 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a municipal council be bound by policies of the Union Government when managing properties transferred to it? The Supreme Court recently addressed this question in

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants in New Delhi Market: New Delhi Municipal Council vs. Ganga Devi & Anr. (2021) INSC 648 (27 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights Under UP Rent Act: Geeta Gupta vs. Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi (20 September 2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Eviction, Judges, Property Law, Tenancy Rights, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 12, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 14

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights Under UP Rent Act: Geeta Gupta vs. Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of tenancy rights under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. CASE TYPE: Property Law/Rent Control Law Case Name: Geeta Gupta vs. Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant Rights Under UP Rent Act: Geeta Gupta vs. Ramesh Chandra Dwivedi (20 September 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Civil Law, Counsel's Authority, Dinesh Maheshwari, Eviction, Hemant Gupta, Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 with Section 14, Judges, Rent Control

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a statement made by a counsel on behalf of a client, regarding re-induction of a tenant, is binding on the client. CASE TYPE: Civil (Rent Control/Eviction). Case Name: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction on Subletting: A. Mahalakshmi vs. Bala Venkatram (2020)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Eviction, Judges, Lease Agreements, M.R. Shah, Possession, Property Law, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 10(2)(i), Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 2(6)

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction on Subletting: A. Mahalakshmi vs. Bala Venkatram (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant sublet the property without the landlord’s consent, warranting eviction. CASE TYPE: Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Rent Control Case Name: A. Mahalakshmi vs. Bala Venkatram (D) Through LR & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 07 January 2020 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 07

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction on Subletting: A. Mahalakshmi vs. Bala Venkatram (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Religious Premises Act: Tenants of Religious Institutions Not Entitled to Rent Act Protection (4 December 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Eviction, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Krishna Murari, N. V. Ramana, Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997, Religious Premises, Rent Control, Sanjiv Khanna, Unauthorised Occupation

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Religious Premises Act: Tenants of Religious Institutions Not Entitled to Rent Act Protection (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether tenants of religious institutions are entitled to protection under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, or if they can be treated differently under a separate law. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Landlord

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Religious Premises Act: Tenants of Religious Institutions Not Entitled to Rent Act Protection (4 December 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies discretionary power of Rent Controller in striking out tenant’s defence in eviction cases: Dina Nath vs. Subhash Chand Saini (24 September 2019)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Arun Mishra, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with Section 15(1), Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with Section 15(7), Eviction, Eviction Proceedings, Judges, M.R. Shah, Rent Control Law, Rent Payment, Tenant Protection

Supreme Court on Discretionary Power of Rent Controller in Striking Out Tenant’s Defence: Dina Nath vs. Subhash Chand Saini (2019) Date of the Judgment: 24 September 2019 Citation: Dina Nath (D) By Lrs & Anr. vs Subhash Chand Saini & Ors. CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 4563 OF 2014 Judges: Arun Mishra, J., M.R. Shah, J., Ajay

Supreme Court clarifies discretionary power of Rent Controller in striking out tenant’s defence in eviction cases: Dina Nath vs. Subhash Chand Saini (24 September 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Eviction, Judges, Property Law, R. Banumathi, Rent Control, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 10(3)(a)(iii), Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 14(1)(b)

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a landlord’s claim for eviction for personal use is valid, and what is the relevant date for assessing this requirement. CASE TYPE: Rent Control / Property Law Case Name: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan [Judgment Date]: September

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Stay on Eviction Order: Laxmi Chaudhary vs. Sahib Singh Chaudhary (2019)

/ Appeals, Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Eviction, Execution, Judges, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy, Rent Control, Stay Orders

Supreme Court Restores Stay on Eviction Order: Laxmi Chaudhary vs. Sahib Singh Chaudhary (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s stay on an eviction order should be vacated for non-compliance of a conditional order, and the determination of fair compensation for use and occupation of premises. CASE TYPE: Civil (Eviction and Rent) Case Name: Laxmi Chaudhary

Supreme Court Restores Stay on Eviction Order: Laxmi Chaudhary vs. Sahib Singh Chaudhary (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Business Needs: Deepak Tandon vs. Rajesh Kumar Gupta (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, Eviction, Judges, Landlord Tenant Dispute, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 21(1)(a)

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Business Needs: Deepak Tandon vs. Rajesh Kumar Gupta (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a landlord can seek eviction of a tenant from a property under Section 21(1)(a) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 for their business needs, even if the

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Right to Evict Tenant for Business Needs: Deepak Tandon vs. Rajesh Kumar Gupta (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Landlord’s Bona Fide Need: Hukum Chandra vs. Nemi Chand Jain (2018)

/ Eviction, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Landlord-Tenant Law, Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961, Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 with Section 12(1)(f), R. Banumathi

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Landlord’s Bona Fide Need: Hukum Chandra vs. Nemi Chand Jain (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a landlord can evict a tenant based on the bona fide requirement of their son, even if the son is engaged in some business at the time of the suit, and whether subsequent events, such

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Based on Landlord’s Bona Fide Need: Hukum Chandra vs. Nemi Chand Jain (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top