Land Dispute

Supreme Court Upholds Sale of Disputed Evacuee Property: Rani Chander Kanta vs. Union of India (2024)

Supreme Court Upholds Sale of Disputed Evacuee Property: Rani Chander Kanta vs. Union of India (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute over the extent of property sold under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Rani Chander Kanta (D) Thr. Lrs. & Ors. vs. Union of India & Anr. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Sale of Disputed Evacuee Property: Rani Chander Kanta vs. Union of India (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Pre-Partition Tenants’ Rights to be Decided: Indu Bai vs. State of Telangana (21 January 2020)

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Pre-Partition Tenants’ Rights to be Decided: Indu Bai vs. State of Telangana (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether pre-partition tenants have a right to continue in possession of land transferred to the State Government. CASE TYPE: Land Dispute, Property Law Case Name: Indu Bai & Ors. vs. State of Telangana &

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case: Pre-Partition Tenants’ Rights to be Decided: Indu Bai vs. State of Telangana (21 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the reasons provided in a related case. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Rajesh s/o Shrirambapu Fate vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. Judgment Date: 19 July 2019 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles interpretation of Gift Deed in property dispute: Chaman Lal vs. Kamlawati (2019) INSC 592 (16 July 2019)

Supreme Court Interprets Gift Deed: Chaman Lal vs. Kamlawati (2019) INSC 592 Date of the Judgment: 16 July 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 592 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J., K.M. Joseph, J. Can a court overturn concurrent findings of lower courts on a matter of fact? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a

Supreme Court settles interpretation of Gift Deed in property dispute: Chaman Lal vs. Kamlawati (2019) INSC 592 (16 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Revenue Records: Dharam Singh vs. Prem Singh (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Revenue Records: Dharam Singh vs. Prem Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an individual can claim ownership of land based on entries in revenue records, even if a competent authority has ordered the deletion of their name from those records. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Dispute Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Rights Based on Revenue Records: Dharam Singh vs. Prem Singh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Co-Bhumidari Rights in Land Dispute: Vijay Kumar vs. Bal Krishan (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of co-bhumidari rights in jointly purchased land. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Revenue Dispute Case Name: Vijay Kumar and Another vs. Bal Krishan and Others [Judgment Date]: December 8, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 8, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 999 Judges: R.K. Agrawal, J., Navin Sinha, J. Can a

Supreme Court Upholds Co-Bhumidari Rights in Land Dispute: Vijay Kumar vs. Bal Krishan (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs parties to approach Tribunal for Ecologically Fragile Land Dispute: L. Radhakrishnan vs. Parakulangara Devaswom (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land is ecologically fragile and whether the State can decline restoration of such land. CASE TYPE: Land Dispute, Environmental Law Case Name: L. Radhakrishnan vs. Parakulangara Devaswom & Anr. Judgment Date: 01 November 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 01 November 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 963 Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and

Supreme Court directs parties to approach Tribunal for Ecologically Fragile Land Dispute: L. Radhakrishnan vs. Parakulangara Devaswom (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the requirement of notice under Section 80 of CPC when a public officer is a party for consequential relief: Ram Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 29, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Dalveer Bhandari, J. Do you need to serve a government official with a notice before suing them, even if they’re only involved in a minor way? The Supreme Court of India clarified this issue in the case of

Supreme Court settles the requirement of notice under Section 80 of CPC when a public officer is a party for consequential relief: Ram Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top