Land Ownership

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Land Ownership, Property Law, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Date of the Judgment: July 08, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 467 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal Can a previous suit between a plaintiff and multiple defendants bar a subsequent suit between the co-defendants? The Supreme Court […]

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Private Land Ownership in Maharashtra Land Dispute: Esteem Properties vs. Chetan Kamble (2022)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Hima Kohli, Judges, Land Ownership, Locus Standi, Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, Maintainability of PIL, N.V. Ramana, Property Law, Property Law with Section 258, Public Interest Litigation

Supreme Court Upholds Private Land Ownership in Maharashtra Land Dispute: Esteem Properties vs. Chetan Kamble (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is maintainable in a dispute regarding the title of a property between a private party and the State. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Esteem Properties Pvt. Ltd.

Supreme Court Upholds Private Land Ownership in Maharashtra Land Dispute: Esteem Properties vs. Chetan Kamble (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles land ownership dispute: State of Goa vs. Narayan V. Gaonkar (2020)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Goa, Daman and Diu Land Revenue Code, 1968, Judges, Land Ownership, Land Records, Land Revenue Law, Land Revenue Law with Section 14, Mining Rights, Navin Sinha, Property Law

Supreme Court Settles Land Ownership Dispute: State of Goa vs. Narayan V. Gaonkar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Dispute over land ownership and the validity of entries in land records. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Land Revenue Case Name: State of Goa vs. Narayan V. Gaonkar & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 04, 2020 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court settles land ownership dispute: State of Goa vs. Narayan V. Gaonkar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Reversionary Rights, Denies Absolute Ownership Under Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act: Ajit Kaur vs. Darshan Singh (2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 14, Judges, Land Ownership, Possession of Property, Property Law, Property Rights of Women, Reversionary Rights, Title Disputes

Supreme Court Upholds Reversionary Rights, Denies Absolute Ownership Under Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act: Ajit Kaur vs. Darshan Singh (2019) Date of the Judgment: April 4, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 325 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a woman, who is in possession of a property without a valid title, claim absolute

Supreme Court Upholds Reversionary Rights, Denies Absolute Ownership Under Section 14 of Hindu Succession Act: Ajit Kaur vs. Darshan Singh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Exemption Under Kerala Private Forests Act: State of Kerala vs. Joseph (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Exemption from Vesting, Judges, Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 with Section 3(2), Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 with Section 3(3), Land Law, Land Ownership, Land Vesting, S. Abdul Nazeer

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Exemption Under Kerala Private Forests Act: State of Kerala vs. Joseph (2018) Date of the Judgment: September 25, 2018 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. This was a unanimous decision by a two-judge bench. Can a landowner be exempted from the vesting of

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Exemption Under Kerala Private Forests Act: State of Kerala vs. Joseph (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Ownership Rights in Land Dispute: Eureka Builders vs. Gulabchand (2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Judges, Karnataka Village Abolition Act, 1961, Land Ownership, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 64, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 27, Property Law, R.K. Agrawal, Transfer of Property

Supreme Court Upholds Ownership Rights in Land Dispute: Eureka Builders vs. Gulabchand (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of ownership rights in a land dispute involving prior sales, re-grants, and limitation. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: M/s Eureka Builders & Ors. vs. Gulabchand s/o Veljee Dand Since Deceased by L.Rs. & Ors. Judgment Date: May

Supreme Court Upholds Ownership Rights in Land Dispute: Eureka Builders vs. Gulabchand (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top