Property Law

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case for Detailed Review: Sulochanabai Swaropchand Chawre vs. The Additional Commissioner, Amravati

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Easement Rights, Judges, Land Law, Order 41, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Property Disputes, S. Ravindra Bhat, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case for Detailed Review: Sulochanabai Swaropchand Chawre vs. The Additional Commissioner, Amravati LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can dismiss a writ petition challenging an order directing the creation of a road through private land without considering essential issues such as easement rights. CASE TYPE: Civil Dispute, Land Law Case […]

Supreme Court Remands Land Dispute Case for Detailed Review: Sulochanabai Swaropchand Chawre vs. The Additional Commissioner, Amravati Read Post »

Supreme Court settles dispute over sale deed and agreement to sell: K.N. Nagarajappa & Ors. vs. H. Narasimha Reddy (2021)

/ Agreement to Sell, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 103, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Property Law, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sale Deed

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court Decision on Land Sale Dispute: K.N. Nagarajappa vs. H. Narasimha Reddy (2021) Date of the Judgment: 09 September 2021 Citation: 2021 INSC 616 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a High Court interfere with the factual findings of a lower appellate court in a second appeal?

Supreme Court settles dispute over sale deed and agreement to sell: K.N. Nagarajappa & Ors. vs. H. Narasimha Reddy (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court Decision in Property Dispute: Rakesh Bhushan Prasad vs. Radha Devi (2021)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 with Section 103A, Judges, Mutation of Property, Partition of Property, Property Disputes, Property Law, Sanjiv Khanna

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court Decision in Property Dispute: Rakesh Bhushan Prasad vs. Radha Devi (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of title in a property dispute based on historical partitions and mutation records. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Rakesh Bhushan Prasad Alias Rakesh Prasad And Others vs. Radha Devi (D) By Lrs. And Others

Supreme Court Upholds Trial Court Decision in Property Dispute: Rakesh Bhushan Prasad vs. Radha Devi (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies consumer status in property conversion cases: Estate Officer vs. Charanjit Kaur (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Building Rules, 1973, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(d), Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with Section 2(1)(o), Freehold Property, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Leasehold Property, Property Law

Supreme Court clarifies consumer status in property conversion cases: Estate Officer vs. Charanjit Kaur (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an allottee seeking conversion of leasehold property to freehold is a ‘consumer’ under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law, Property Law Case Name: Estate Officer and Anr. vs. Charanjit Kaur [Judgment Date]: 7 September

Supreme Court clarifies consumer status in property conversion cases: Estate Officer vs. Charanjit Kaur (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of suit for injunction without declaration of title: Kayalulla Parambath Moidu Haji vs. Namboodiyil Vinodan (2021)

/ B.R. Gavai, Civil Law, Injunctions, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Property Law, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 38, Title Disputes

Supreme Court on Suit for Injunction Without Declaration of Title: Kayalulla Parambath Moidu Haji vs. Namboodiyil Vinodan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for permanent injunction can be maintained without seeking a declaration of title. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name: Kayalulla Parambath Moidu Haji vs. Namboodiyil Vinodan [Judgment Date]: September 7,

Supreme Court clarifies maintainability of suit for injunction without declaration of title: Kayalulla Parambath Moidu Haji vs. Namboodiyil Vinodan (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Suit Due to Lack of Proven Possession: Balasubramanian vs. M. Arockiasamy (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Hrishikesh Roy, Injunction, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Second Appeal, Section 100, Civil Procedure Code, 1908

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Suit Due to Lack of Proven Possession: Balasubramanian vs. M. Arockiasamy (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for a bare injunction is maintainable when the plaintiff’s title is disputed and they fail to prove their possession of the suit property. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Property Dispute Case Name:

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Suit Due to Lack of Proven Possession: Balasubramanian vs. M. Arockiasamy (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Municipal Authority’s Power in Building Plan Disputes: Debabrata Saha vs. Serampore Municipality (2021)

/ B.R. Gavai, Civil Court, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Municipal Authority, Property Dispute, Property Law, West Bengal Municipal Act, 1996, West Bengal Municipal Act, 1996 with Section 217, West Bengal Municipal Act, 1996 with Section 218

Supreme Court clarifies Municipal Authority’s Power in Building Plan Disputes: Debabrata Saha vs. Serampore Municipality (2021) Date of the Judgment: September 01, 2021 Citation: Debabrata Saha vs. Serampore Municipality & Ors. Civil Appeal No. 3657 of 2010 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and B.R. Gavai, J. Can a municipal authority revoke a building plan based

Supreme Court clarifies Municipal Authority’s Power in Building Plan Disputes: Debabrata Saha vs. Serampore Municipality (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Title Suit: P. Ishwari Bai vs. Anjani Bai (2021)

/ B.R. Gavai, Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLI Rule 27, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLI Rule 4, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Property Dispute

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Title Suit: P. Ishwari Bai vs. Anjani Bai (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in admitting additional evidence under Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and dismissing the suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession. CASE TYPE: Civil Law –

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Title Suit: P. Ishwari Bai vs. Anjani Bai (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Property Dispute: Ramdas Waydhan Gadlinge vs. Gyanchand Nanuram Kriplani (2021)

/ Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLII, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Property Dispute, Second Appeal, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Property Dispute: Ramdas Waydhan Gadlinge vs. Gyanchand Nanuram Kriplani (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in summarily dismissing a second appeal after admitting it on substantial questions of law. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Ramdas Waydhan Gadlinge (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs. Vatsalabai Ramdas

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Property Dispute: Ramdas Waydhan Gadlinge vs. Gyanchand Nanuram Kriplani (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment: Mallanagouda vs. Ninganagouda (2021) INSC 157 (12 March 2021)

/ Appellate Jurisdiction, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 20 Rule 18, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 41 Rule 27, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 100, First Appellate Court, High Court, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Land Allotment, Partition of Property, Property Law, S. Ravindra Bhat, Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment Date of the Judgment: 12 March 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 157 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a High Court interfere with a First Appellate Court’s factual findings in a property partition case? The Supreme Court addressed this question in

Supreme Court Upholds Partition Decree, Emphasizes Convenience in Land Allotment: Mallanagouda vs. Ninganagouda (2021) INSC 157 (12 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Revises Land Resumption Terms in Noida Hotel Plot Case: Hampshire Hotels and Resorts vs. Ritu Maheshwari (2021)

/ Civil Contempt, Contempt of Court, Contempt of Court with Section 2(b), Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Allotment, Lease Agreements, Noida Authority, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Revises Land Resumption Terms in Noida Hotel Plot Case LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court and land resumption terms. CASE TYPE: Contempt Petition arising from a Civil Appeal related to land allotment. Case Name: Hampshire Hotels and Resorts (Noida) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Ritu Maheshwari, Chief Executive Officer, New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA). [Judgment

Supreme Court Revises Land Resumption Terms in Noida Hotel Plot Case: Hampshire Hotels and Resorts vs. Ritu Maheshwari (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Criminal Case Back to Delhi: Swaati Nirkhi vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (9 March 2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 177, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 389, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Criminal Case Back to Delhi: Swaati Nirkhi vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: The primary legal issue revolves around the appropriate jurisdiction for the trial of a criminal case, specifically concerning where the cause of action arose. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law – Transfer Petition Case Name: Swaati Nirkhi

Supreme Court Orders Transfer of Criminal Case Back to Delhi: Swaati Nirkhi vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (9 March 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top