Property Law

Supreme Court Eviction Order: Tenant Defaults on Rent Payments (2024)

/ Eviction, Property Law, Rent Control, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 20, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 30

Supreme Court Eviction Order: Tenant Defaults on Rent Payments (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant can be evicted for non-payment of rent despite the protection available under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Rent Control, Eviction Case Name: Prakash Bhalotia (D) Thr His Lrs […]

Supreme Court Eviction Order: Tenant Defaults on Rent Payments (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Stamp Duty on Agreements to Sell with Possession Transfer: Shyamsundar Radheshyam Agrawal vs. Pushpabai Nilkanth Patil (2024) INSC 730 (24 September 2024)

/ Agreements to Sell, Conveyance, Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958, Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 with Article 25, Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 with Section 4, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Stamp Duty on Agreements to Sell with Possession Transfer Date of the Judgment: 24 September 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 730 Judges: Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice R. Mahadevan Can an agreement to sell an immovable property, which includes a clause for transferring possession to the purchaser, be considered a conveyance and thus

Supreme Court Upholds Stamp Duty on Agreements to Sell with Possession Transfer: Shyamsundar Radheshyam Agrawal vs. Pushpabai Nilkanth Patil (2024) INSC 730 (24 September 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court Order on Land Dispute: HMT Ltd. vs. Rukmini (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Delay and Laches, Land Acquisition, Property Law, Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952, Requisition and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1952 with Section 7(1)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court Order on Land Dispute: HMT Ltd. vs. Rukmini (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a writ petition can be entertained after a significant delay and with suppression of material facts in a land dispute case. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition and Property Law Case Name: HMT Ltd. vs. Smt. Rukmini and others [Judgment

Supreme Court Overturns High Court Order on Land Dispute: HMT Ltd. vs. Rukmini (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Common Passage Rights in Property Dispute: Kamal Kishore Sehgal vs. Murti Devi (2024)

/ Common Passage Rights, Interpretation of Deeds, Property Disputes, Property Law, Sale Deed Interpretation, Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Supreme Court Clarifies Common Passage Rights in Property Dispute: Kamal Kishore Sehgal vs. Murti Devi (2024) Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 707 Judges: Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice R. Mahadevan Can a property owner claim a right to use a passage on a neighboring property simply because it aligns with

Supreme Court Clarifies Common Passage Rights in Property Dispute: Kamal Kishore Sehgal vs. Murti Devi (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Rights, Denies Compensation to Unauthorized Occupants in Property Dispute

/ Civil Procedure, Claims, Compensation, Evidence, Land Acquisition, Mysore (Personnel & Miscellaneous) Inams Abolition Act, 1954, Pleadings, Property Law, Vesting of Land

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Rights, Denies Compensation to Unauthorized Occupants in Property Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Entitlement to compensation for land acquired for public projects when ownership is disputed. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Lakshmesh M. vs. P. Rajalakshmi (Dead) by Lrs. and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 11 September 2024 Date of the Judgment: 11

Supreme Court Upholds Landowner’s Rights, Denies Compensation to Unauthorized Occupants in Property Dispute Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Eviction by Consensus in Property Dispute: Sikha Ghosh vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (2024)

/ Civil Law, Consensual Agreement, Eviction, Property Dispute Resolution, Property Law

Supreme Court Directs Eviction by Consensus in Property Dispute: Sikha Ghosh vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Eviction of a tenant from a property. CASE TYPE: Civil dispute regarding property possession. Case Name: Sikha Ghosh & Others vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Ors. [Judgment Date]: September 09, 2024 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Directs Eviction by Consensus in Property Dispute: Sikha Ghosh vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Mesne Profits Inquiry Timeline in Property Dispute: Choudappa vs. Choudappa (2024)

/ Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XX Rule 12, Mesne Profits, Property Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Mesne Profits Inquiry Timeline in Property Dispute: Choudappa vs. Choudappa (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an application for determination of mesne profits, filed years after a decree for possession, is barred by limitation. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Choudappa & Anr. vs. Choudappa Since Deceased By Lrs. & Ors. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court clarifies Mesne Profits Inquiry Timeline in Property Dispute: Choudappa vs. Choudappa (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court resolves eviction dispute of temple tenants in Tamil Nadu: K. Balasubramani vs. The Tamil Nadu Government (2024) INSC 140 (23 February 2024)

/ Eviction, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 with Section 78, Property Disputes, Property Law

Supreme Court resolves eviction dispute of temple tenants in Tamil Nadu: K. Balasubramani vs. The Tamil Nadu Government (2024) INSC 140 (23 February 2024) Date of the Judgment: 23 February 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 140 Judges: J.K. Maheshwari, J., Sanjay Karol, J. Can a long-standing dispute between temple authorities and tenants be resolved amicably? The

Supreme Court resolves eviction dispute of temple tenants in Tamil Nadu: K. Balasubramani vs. The Tamil Nadu Government (2024) INSC 140 (23 February 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court enhances interest for delayed flat possession: Vidya vs. Parsvnath Developers (2024)

/ Breach of contract, Construction Delays, Consumer Law, Consumer Law with Consumer Protection Act, 2019, Consumer Protection Act, Consumer Rights, Contract Law, Contract Law with Section 73, Indian Contract Act, 1872, Contractual Obligations, Property Law, Real Estate Law, Real Estate Regulation

Supreme Court enhances interest for delayed flat possession: Vidya vs. Parsvnath Developers (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) was justified in awarding interest at a rate lower than what was stipulated in the agreement for delayed possession of a flat. CASE TYPE: Consumer. Case Name: Vidya and Others vs. M/s

Supreme Court enhances interest for delayed flat possession: Vidya vs. Parsvnath Developers (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024)

/ Burden of Proof, Donation of Land, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 110, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Ownership, Possession, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for possession of land is maintainable when the land was donated to the State for a public purpose and the suit is filed after a long period of possession by the State.

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns specific performance decree due to lack of readiness and willingness: Pydi Ramana vs. Davarasetty Manmadha Rao (2024)

/ Contract Law, Property Law, Readiness and Willingness, Sale Agreement, Specific Performance, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 16, Time as Essence of Contract

Supreme Court overturns specific performance decree due to lack of readiness and willingness: Pydi Ramana vs. Davarasetty Manmadha Rao (2024) Date of the Judgment: July 10, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 507 Judges: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. and Aravind Kumar, J. Can a buyer who delays action for years still demand specific performance of a property

Supreme Court overturns specific performance decree due to lack of readiness and willingness: Pydi Ramana vs. Davarasetty Manmadha Rao (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024)

/ Adverse Possession, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 11, Land Ownership, Property Law, Res Judicata

Supreme Court Clarifies Res Judicata in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Date of the Judgment: July 08, 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 467 Judges: Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Pankaj Mithal Can a previous suit between a plaintiff and multiple defendants bar a subsequent suit between the co-defendants? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court clarifies the application of Res Judicata between Co-defendants in Property Dispute: Har Narayan Tewari vs. Cantonment Board (2024) Read Post »

Scroll to Top