Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Absolute Sale Deed, Rejects Conditional Sale Claim: D.R. Rathna Murthy vs. Ramappa (2010)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a sale deed with interlineations and additions made after its execution can be considered a conditional sale deed, entitling the seller to repurchase the property. CASE TYPE: Civil (Specific Performance) Case Name: D.R. Rathna Murthy vs. Ramappa [Judgment Date]: 8th October 2010 Date of the Judgment: 8th October 2010 Citation: D.R. Rathna […]

Supreme Court Upholds Absolute Sale Deed, Rejects Conditional Sale Claim: D.R. Rathna Murthy vs. Ramappa (2010) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles promotion rules for LDCs and UDCs in District Courts: Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Judges: Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J., R.V. Raveendran J. Does a delay in seeking a promotion nullify a legitimate claim under statutory service rules? The Supreme Court in Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan examined appeals against a Delhi High Court order concerning the promotion of Lower

Supreme Court settles promotion rules for LDCs and UDCs in District Courts: Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the requirement of notice under Section 80 of CPC when a public officer is a party for consequential relief: Ram Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 29, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Dalveer Bhandari, J. Do you need to serve a government official with a notice before suing them, even if they’re only involved in a minor way? The Supreme Court of India clarified this issue in the case of

Supreme Court settles the requirement of notice under Section 80 of CPC when a public officer is a party for consequential relief: Ram Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside arbitrary rent increase in tenant eviction case: Sunil Kumar vs. Surendra Kumar Agrarwal (26 September 2008)

Date of the Judgment: 26 September 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.V. Raveendran and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a High Court arbitrarily increase rent in an interim order during a tenant eviction case? The Supreme Court addressed this

Supreme Court sets aside arbitrary rent increase in tenant eviction case: Sunil Kumar vs. Surendra Kumar Agrarwal (26 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court modifies damages for tenant in long-standing eviction case: Diwakar Upadhyay vs. P.N. Khanna (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 26, 2008 Judges: R.V. Raveendran and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ. What happens when a tenant refuses to leave a property for decades, despite court orders? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a case involving a long-standing dispute between a landlord and a tenant. The core question

Supreme Court modifies damages for tenant in long-standing eviction case: Diwakar Upadhyay vs. P.N. Khanna (2008) Read Post »

Partition Suit: Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Consideration in K. Keshava Bhat vs. Devaki Amma (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 18, 2008 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Justice R.V. Raveendran, Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta When family disputes over property reach the courts, ensuring a fair hearing with all evidence considered is crucial. This case involves a decades-long partition suit

Partition Suit: Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Consideration in K. Keshava Bhat vs. Devaki Amma (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the bonafide requirement of landlord in eviction petition: Ajit Singh vs. Jit Ram (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Citation: [2008] INSC 1471 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can a landlord evict a tenant if the property is required for the use of the landlord’s son? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the interpretation of the East Punjab

Supreme Court settles the bonafide requirement of landlord in eviction petition: Ajit Singh vs. Jit Ram (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the partition of Inam lands within a family: K.V. Sudharshan vs. A. Ramakrishnappa (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. When a family elder is granted Inam lands due to their position as the Archak (priest) of a temple, can these lands be considered solely their individual property, or do they belong to the entire

Supreme Court settles the partition of Inam lands within a family: K.V. Sudharshan vs. A. Ramakrishnappa (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside eviction decree, recognizing firm as statutory tenant: Gautham Bhavan vs. Sakuntala Sahu (2008)

Date of the Judgment: September 05, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5516 of 2008 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 5500 of 2008) Judges: B.N. Agrawal, J. and G.S. Singhvi, J. Can a court disregard prior judgments establishing tenancy rights in an eviction suit? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a

Supreme Court sets aside eviction decree, recognizing firm as statutory tenant: Gautham Bhavan vs. Sakuntala Sahu (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court holds Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. liable for sales tax dues as an agent of its lessee: Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. vs. State of Kerala (2008)

Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2008 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 1804-1807 of 2008 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 18346 – 18349 of 2004) Judges: S.B. Sinha, J., Harjit Singh Bedi, J. Can a lessor be held responsible for the sales tax dues of its lessee if the lessee defaults? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court holds Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. liable for sales tax dues as an agent of its lessee: Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd. vs. State of Kerala (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the law on necessary parties in mortgage redemption suits: Mohd. Hussain vs. Gopibai (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19th February 2008 Citation: Appeal (civil) 912 of 1999 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J. and A.K. Mathur, J. When a person who has mortgaged their property wants to get it back, can they be stopped because not all family members of the person who lent the money are involved in the

Supreme Court settles the law on necessary parties in mortgage redemption suits: Mohd. Hussain vs. Gopibai (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Consideration of Will in Property Dispute: N. Srihari (D) vs. N. Prakash (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 19th February 2008 Case Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat & P. Sathasivam In a dispute over property rights, can a will that is referenced in court documents but not formally presented as evidence be considered? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Consideration of Will in Property Dispute: N. Srihari (D) vs. N. Prakash (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top