Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Lease Violation: Yuvraj vs. Janardan (2023)

/ Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947, Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 with Section 13(1)(e), Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947 with Section 15(1), Judges, Lease Agreement, Property Law, Sanjay Kumar, Sudhanshu Dhulia, Tenancy Dispute

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Lease Violation: Yuvraj vs. Janardan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s assignment of business within a leased premise constitutes a breach of lease conditions, warranting eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Tenancy Dispute Case Name: Yuvraj @ Munna Pralhad […]

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction for Lease Violation: Yuvraj vs. Janardan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Freehold Conversion for Leased Land: Bhasin Infotech vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023)

/ Contract Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Government Policy, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Lease Agreements, Tourism Policy, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 105

Supreme Court Denies Freehold Conversion for Leased Land: Bhasin Infotech vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 17, 2023 Citation: Not Available Judges: Dinesh Maheshwari, J. and J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can a company demand conversion of leasehold land to freehold based on a later government policy? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Denies Freehold Conversion for Leased Land: Bhasin Infotech vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Freehold Conversion for Leased Land: Bhasin Infotech vs. State of UP (2023)

/ Contract Law, Dinesh Maheshwari, Freehold, Government Policy, Interpretation of Contracts, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Land Law, Lease Agreement, Leasehold, Policy Interpretation, Prospective Application, Terms and Conditions, Tourism Policy, Uttar Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation (UPSIDC)

Supreme Court Denies Freehold Conversion for Leased Land: Bhasin Infotech vs. State of UP (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a lessee of industrial land is entitled to convert the leasehold to freehold based on a subsequent policy for tourism promotion. CASE TYPE: Land Law/Property Law Case Name: Bhasin Infotech and Infrastructure Private Ltd. vs. State of

Supreme Court Denies Freehold Conversion for Leased Land: Bhasin Infotech vs. State of UP (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985, Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985 with Section 9, Civil Law, Curative Petition, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Mass Disaster, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, Settlement, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can re-examine a settlement reached in a case of mass disaster, specifically concerning the adequacy of compensation, after a lapse of several years and multiple reviews. CASE TYPE: Civil (Curative Petition)

Supreme Court Dismisses Curative Petition in Bhopal Gas Tragedy Case: Union of India vs. Union Carbide Corporation (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds “One Site One Shop” Policy in Chandigarh Market Dispute: Gurjit Singh vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh (2023) INSC 175 (03 March 2023)

/ Allotment of Public Spaces, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Licensing, Licensing of Auction Platform Rules, 1981, M.R. Shah, Market Committee, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds “One Site One Shop” Policy in Chandigarh Market Dispute Date of the Judgment: 03 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 175 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a shop owner in a market claim a right to the auction platform directly in front of their shop? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Upholds “One Site One Shop” Policy in Chandigarh Market Dispute: Gurjit Singh vs. Union Territory, Chandigarh (2023) INSC 175 (03 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on lease cancellation: Debidutta Mohanty vs. Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik (2023) INSC 179

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Contract Law, Judges, Lease Agreements, M. R. Shah, Orissa Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 2016, Orissa Minor Minerals Concession Rules, 2016 with Rule 51(7), Tender Process

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on lease cancellation: Debidutta Mohanty vs. Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik (2023) INSC 179 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a lease granted based on an invalid solvency certificate can be cancelled. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Lease Dispute Case Name: Debidutta Mohanty vs. Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 3, 2023

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on lease cancellation: Debidutta Mohanty vs. Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik (2023) INSC 179 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in property disputes: Future Sector Land Developers vs. Bagmane Developers (2023)

/ Civil Law, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Order VII Rule 10, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 16, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 20, Judges, Jurisdiction, Pankaj Mithal, Property Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Property Dispute: Future Sector Land Developers vs. Bagmane Developers (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct jurisdiction for suits involving immovable property when contractual rights are also involved. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Property Dispute, Jurisdiction Case Name: Future Sector Land Developers LLP & Anr. vs. Bagmane Developers P. Ltd. & Ors.

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in property disputes: Future Sector Land Developers vs. Bagmane Developers (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, Eviction, Judges, Manoj Misra, Rent Control, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 20(4)

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant is entitled to protection from eviction under Section 20(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, if they deposit the arrears of rent, interest, and costs, even if

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, Eviction, Judges, Manoj Misra, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 20(4)

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 1, 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 5981 of 2014 Judges: Justice Manoj Misra and Justice Aravind Kumar Can a tenant be evicted for a minor discrepancy in the claimed rent amount, even after depositing the

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property development dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Civil Procedure, Development Agreements, Judges, M. R. Shah, Property Law, Sanjay Karol, Special Leave Petitions

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property development dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Leave Petition can be withdrawn due to subsequent developments in a property development dispute. CASE TYPE: Property Development/Civil Case Name: S.M. Pasha & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. Judgment Date: 17

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property development dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Civil Procedure, Development Agreement, Judges, M. R. Shah, Property Dispute, Property Law, Sanjay Karol, Special Leave Petition, Withdrawal of Petition

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Leave Petition can be withdrawn unconditionally due to subsequent developments in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Property Law. Case Name: S.M. Pasha & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Judgment Date]: February 17,

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Possession, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation is deposited in the treasury instead of being paid to

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top