Possession

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024)

/ Burden of Proof, Donation of Land, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 110, Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 58, Limitation Act, 1963 with Article 65, Ownership, Possession, Property Law

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for possession of land is maintainable when the land was donated to the State for a public purpose and the suit is filed after a long period of possession by the State. […]

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Possession of Land Donated for Veterinary Hospital: State of Punjab vs. Bhagwantpal Singh (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30/31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Possession, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if either possession is taken or compensation is paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Possession, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation is deposited in the treasury instead of being paid to

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Ram Chander Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction on Subletting: A. Mahalakshmi vs. Bala Venkatram (2020)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Eviction, Judges, Lease Agreements, M.R. Shah, Possession, Property Law, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 10(2)(i), Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 2(6)

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction on Subletting: A. Mahalakshmi vs. Bala Venkatram (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant sublet the property without the landlord’s consent, warranting eviction. CASE TYPE: Landlord-Tenant Dispute, Rent Control Case Name: A. Mahalakshmi vs. Bala Venkatram (D) Through LR & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 07 January 2020 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 07

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction on Subletting: A. Mahalakshmi vs. Bala Venkatram (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Include Necessary Party in Property Dispute: Kamlesh Gupta vs. Mangat Rai (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 10, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order VI Rule 17, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 151, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Mortgage, Possession, Property Law

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Include Necessary Party in Property Dispute: Kamlesh Gupta vs. Mangat Rai (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can allow the amendment of a plaint to include a necessary party after the commencement of the trial. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Kamlesh Gupta vs. Mangat Rai &

Supreme Court Allows Amendment of Plaint to Include Necessary Party in Property Dispute: Kamlesh Gupta vs. Mangat Rai (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Injunction Based on Possession: Sunkamma vs. S. Pushparaj (2017)

/ Civil Law, General Power of Attorney, Injunction, Judges, Possession, Property Law, R. Banumathi, R.K. Agrawal, Suits, Transfer of Property Act, 1882

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a permanent injunction can be granted based on possession of property supported by a General Power of Attorney, even without a registered sale deed. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Law) Case Name: Sunkamma (D) by LRs. vs. S. Pushparaj (D) by LRs. Judgment Date: 14 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 14 December

Supreme Court Upholds Injunction Based on Possession: Sunkamma vs. S. Pushparaj (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top