Rent Control

Supreme Court Eviction Order: Tenant Defaults on Rent Payments (2024)

/ Eviction, Property Law, Rent Control, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 20, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 30

Supreme Court Eviction Order: Tenant Defaults on Rent Payments (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant can be evicted for non-payment of rent despite the protection available under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972. CASE TYPE: Property Law, Rent Control, Eviction Case Name: Prakash Bhalotia (D) Thr His Lrs […]

Supreme Court Eviction Order: Tenant Defaults on Rent Payments (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant Under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 136, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 with Section 13-B, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 with Section 18-A, Rent Control

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant Under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) landlord can evict a tenant under the summary procedure of Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, when the landlord’s family members own other shops in

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction of Tenant Under Section 13-B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 in eviction cases: Ravi Khandelwal vs. M/S. Taluka Stores (2023) INSC 615 (11 July 2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Eviction Suit, Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950, Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 with Section 14(3), Rent Control

Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 in eviction cases: Ravi Khandelwal vs. M/S. Taluka Stores (2023) INSC 615 (11 July 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 regarding the restriction on

Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of Section 14(3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 in eviction cases: Ravi Khandelwal vs. M/S. Taluka Stores (2023) INSC 615 (11 July 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, Eviction, Judges, Manoj Misra, Rent Control, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 20(4)

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant is entitled to protection from eviction under Section 20(4) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, if they deposit the arrears of rent, interest, and costs, even if

Supreme Court Protects Tenant from Eviction Despite Rent Dispute: Shanti Prasad vs. Thakur Dass (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction dispute in property lease: Subhash Chander & Ors. vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr. (28 January 2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 with Section 13, Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973 with Section 2(h), Judges, Property Law, Rent Control

Supreme Court Upholds Rent Act Jurisdiction in Lease Dispute: Subhash Chander vs. Bharat Petroleum (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a civil court has jurisdiction to entertain a suit for possession of property governed by the Haryana (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1973, or if such matters fall under the purview of the Rent Controller. CASE

Supreme Court settles jurisdiction dispute in property lease: Subhash Chander & Ors. vs. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. & Anr. (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies NRI Landlord Eviction Rights Under East Punjab Rent Act: Padam Nabh & Sons vs. Yash Pal (2021)

/ Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 with Section 14B, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 with Section 13B, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Lease of Immovable Property, NRI Eviction Rights, Rent Control, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 106(1), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies NRI Landlord Eviction Rights Under East Punjab Rent Act LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Non-Resident Indian (NRI) who purchases a property with an existing tenant can invoke the summary eviction process under Section 13B of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. CASE TYPE: Rent Control/Eviction Law Case Name: Padam Nabh &

Supreme Court Clarifies NRI Landlord Eviction Rights Under East Punjab Rent Act: Padam Nabh & Sons vs. Yash Pal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Civil Law, Counsel's Authority, Dinesh Maheshwari, Eviction, Hemant Gupta, Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987, Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 with Section 14, Judges, Rent Control

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a statement made by a counsel on behalf of a client, regarding re-induction of a tenant, is binding on the client. CASE TYPE: Civil (Rent Control/Eviction). Case Name: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Enforces Counsel’s Commitment for Tenant Re-induction in Reconstruction Case: Om Prakash vs. Suresh Kumar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Religious Premises Act: Tenants of Religious Institutions Not Entitled to Rent Act Protection (4 December 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Eviction, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Krishna Murari, N. V. Ramana, Punjab Religious Premises and Land (Eviction and Rent Recovery) Act, 1997, Religious Premises, Rent Control, Sanjiv Khanna, Unauthorised Occupation

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Religious Premises Act: Tenants of Religious Institutions Not Entitled to Rent Act Protection (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether tenants of religious institutions are entitled to protection under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, or if they can be treated differently under a separate law. CASE TYPE: Civil Law – Landlord

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Religious Premises Act: Tenants of Religious Institutions Not Entitled to Rent Act Protection (4 December 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Eviction, Judges, Property Law, R. Banumathi, Rent Control, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 10(3)(a)(iii), Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 with Section 14(1)(b)

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a landlord’s claim for eviction for personal use is valid, and what is the relevant date for assessing this requirement. CASE TYPE: Rent Control / Property Law Case Name: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan [Judgment Date]: September

Supreme Court Upholds Landlord’s Eviction Claim for Personal Use: D. Sasi Kumar vs. Soundararajan (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Stay on Eviction Order: Laxmi Chaudhary vs. Sahib Singh Chaudhary (2019)

/ Appeals, Civil Law, Civil Procedure, Eviction, Execution, Judges, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy, Rent Control, Stay Orders

Supreme Court Restores Stay on Eviction Order: Laxmi Chaudhary vs. Sahib Singh Chaudhary (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tenant’s stay on an eviction order should be vacated for non-compliance of a conditional order, and the determination of fair compensation for use and occupation of premises. CASE TYPE: Civil (Eviction and Rent) Case Name: Laxmi Chaudhary

Supreme Court Restores Stay on Eviction Order: Laxmi Chaudhary vs. Sahib Singh Chaudhary (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Eviction Case for Fresh Consideration: V. Govindasamy vs. T.V.R.C. Kannan (2018)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Rent Control, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960, Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960 with Section 10(2), Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960 with Section 11(4)

Supreme Court Remands Eviction Case for Fresh Consideration: V. Govindasamy vs. T.V.R.C. Kannan (2018) Date of the Judgment: November 13, 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and Hemant Gupta, J. Can a case be sent back to the lower court for a fresh hearing even after an order has been passed under Section

Supreme Court Remands Eviction Case for Fresh Consideration: V. Govindasamy vs. T.V.R.C. Kannan (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Review of Vacancy Orders Under UP Urban Buildings Act: Rajendra Kumar Verma vs. Additional District Magistrate (2018) INSC 88 (08 February 2018)

/ Eviction, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Rent Control, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972, Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 with Section 16

Supreme Court Clarifies Review of Vacancy Orders Under UP Urban Buildings Act Date of the Judgment: 08 February 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 88 Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar Can a District Magistrate review an order regarding a building’s vacancy under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction)

Supreme Court Clarifies Review of Vacancy Orders Under UP Urban Buildings Act: Rajendra Kumar Verma vs. Additional District Magistrate (2018) INSC 88 (08 February 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top