Self-Acquired Property

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ancestral property in partition suits: Shashidhar vs. Ashwini Uma Mathad (2024)

/ Ancestral Property, Civil Law, Civil Procedure Code, Coparcenary, Hindu Law, Hindu Law with Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Inheritance, Property Disputes, Property Law, Self-Acquired Property

Supreme Court Clarifies Partition of Ancestral Property: Shashidhar vs. Ashwini Uma Mathad (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether properties acquired through inheritance or transfer can be considered part of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) coparcenary for partition. CASE TYPE: Civil (Property Partition) Case Name: Shashidhar and Others vs. Ashwini Uma Mathad and Another [Judgment Date]: July 8, […]

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of ancestral property in partition suits: Shashidhar vs. Ashwini Uma Mathad (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order I Rule 3, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order II Rule 3, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 8, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Non-Joinder of Parties, Partition of Property, Self-Acquired Property

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether self-acquired properties of a deceased person can be partitioned among legal heirs and whether a suit for partition can be dismissed for non-joinder of other family members and properties. CASE TYPE: Civil (Partition) Case Name:

Supreme Court clarifies partition of self-acquired property in family disputes: B.R. Patil vs. Tulsa Y. Sawkar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Inheritance Rights of Daughters in Self-Acquired Property: Arunachala Gounder vs. Ponnusamy (20 January 2022)

/ Hindu Law, Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 14, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 15, Hindu Succession Act, 1956 with Section 16, Judges, Krishna Murari, Mitakshara Law, S. Abdul Nazeer, Self-Acquired Property, Survivorship

Supreme Court Settles Inheritance Rights of Daughters in Self-Acquired Property: Arunachala Gounder vs. Ponnusamy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Inheritance rights of daughters in the self-acquired property of their father under Hindu Law. CASE TYPE: Civil Law, Property Law, Inheritance Law Case Name: Arunachala Gounder (Dead) By Lrs. vs. Ponnusamy and Ors. [Judgment Date]: 20 January 2022

Supreme Court Settles Inheritance Rights of Daughters in Self-Acquired Property: Arunachala Gounder vs. Ponnusamy (20 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Family Property Dispute: Adiveppa vs. Bhimappa (2017)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Burden of Proof, Documentary Evidence, Evidence Law, Hindu Law, Joint Family Property, Judges, Partition of Property, R.K. Agrawal, Self-Acquired Property

LEGAL ISSUE: Determination of self-acquired vs. ancestral property in a Hindu family. CASE TYPE: Civil property dispute. Case Name: Adiveppa & Ors. vs. Bhimappa & Anr. [Judgment Date]: September 6, 2017 Date of the Judgment: September 6, 2017. Citation: (2017) INSC 782. Judges: Justice R.K. Agrawal and Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre. The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court Upholds Concurrent Findings on Family Property Dispute: Adiveppa vs. Bhimappa (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top