Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decrees in Small Causes Court Cases: Arti Dixit & Anr vs. Sushil Kumar Mishra & Ors (2023) INSC 478 (18 May 2023)

/ Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 145, Ex-parte Decree, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 17, Security Deposit, Setting Aside Decree

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decrees in Small Causes Court Cases Date of the Judgment: 18 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 478 Judges: K.M. Joseph, J., Hrishikesh Roy, J. Can an application to set aside an ex-parte decree be entertained if the applicant fails to deposit the decretal amount or […]

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decrees in Small Causes Court Cases: Arti Dixit & Anr vs. Sushil Kumar Mishra & Ors (2023) INSC 478 (18 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Small Causes Court: Arti Dixit & Anr vs. Sushil Kumar Mishra & Ors (2023)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 145, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 17

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree: Arti Dixit & Anr vs. Sushil Kumar Mishra & Ors (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an application to set aside an ex-parte decree in a Small Causes Court is maintainable if the applicant fails to deposit the decretal amount or furnish valid security at the

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Security Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Small Causes Court: Arti Dixit & Anr vs. Sushil Kumar Mishra & Ors (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Rent Dispute: Shyam Kumar Gupta vs. Shubham Jain (2 February 2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order IX Rule 13, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 17

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Rent Dispute: Shyam Kumar Gupta vs. Shubham Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an ex-parte decree in a rent dispute should be set aside when the tenant has deposited the principal amount of rent and cost, but not the mesne profits, as required under Section 17 of the

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Ex-Parte Decree in Rent Dispute: Shyam Kumar Gupta vs. Shubham Jain (2 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the mandatory deposit for setting aside ex-parte decrees in Small Cause Court Cases: Subodh Kumar vs. Shamim Ahmed (2021) INSC 123 (03 March 2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order 9 Rule 13, Judges, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 17, R. Subhash Reddy

Supreme Court Clarifies Mandatory Deposit for Setting Aside Ex-Parte Decrees in Small Cause Court Cases Date of the Judgment: 03 March 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 123 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., R. Subhash Reddy, J. Can a tenant’s application to set aside an ex-parte decree be rejected if they fail to deposit the full decretal amount

Supreme Court settles the mandatory deposit for setting aside ex-parte decrees in Small Cause Court Cases: Subodh Kumar vs. Shamim Ahmed (2021) INSC 123 (03 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in Small Causes Court cases after UP Civil Laws Amendment Act, 2015: Om Prakash Agarwal vs. Vishan Dayal Rajpoot (2018) INSC 892 (12 October 2018)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Bengal, Agra, Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887, Bengal, Agra, Assam Civil Courts Act, 1887 with Section 25, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Civil Procedure Code, 1908 with Section 21, Cognizance, Judges, Jurisdiction, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 15, Small Causes Court

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in Small Causes Court cases after UP Civil Laws Amendment Act, 2015 Date of the Judgment: 12 October 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 892 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a court’s decision be overturned on a technicality after a full trial? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial

Supreme Court clarifies jurisdiction in Small Causes Court cases after UP Civil Laws Amendment Act, 2015: Om Prakash Agarwal vs. Vishan Dayal Rajpoot (2018) INSC 892 (12 October 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Order: Landlord Wins Rent Dispute in Trilok Singh Chauhan vs. Ram Lal (2017)

/ A. K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 114, Judges, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 with Section 25, Revisional Jurisdiction

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court erred in reversing the Trial Court’s finding on the rate of rent and the eviction order. CASE TYPE: Civil (Landlord-Tenant Dispute) Case Name: Trilok Singh Chauhan vs. Ram Lal (Dead) Thr. Lrs [Judgment Date]: December 11, 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: December 11, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 992

Supreme Court Upholds Eviction Order: Landlord Wins Rent Dispute in Trilok Singh Chauhan vs. Ram Lal (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top