Railway Protection Force Act, 1957

Supreme Court reinstates Constable after discharge for non-disclosure of trivial case: Pawan Kumar vs. Union of India (2 May 2022)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Discharge from Service, Judges, Railway Protection Force Act, 1957, Recruitment, Rule 52, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Suppression of Information

Supreme Court reinstates Constable after discharge for non-disclosure of trivial case: Pawan Kumar vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether non-disclosure of a trivial criminal case, which ended in an honorable acquittal, can be a valid ground for discharging a selected candidate from service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Pawan Kumar vs. Union […]

Supreme Court reinstates Constable after discharge for non-disclosure of trivial case: Pawan Kumar vs. Union of India (2 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement in Railway Protection Force Neglect of Duty Case: Director General of Police, Railway Protection Force vs. Rajendra Kumar Dubey (25 November 2020)

/ Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Disciplinary Proceedings, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Judicial Review, K. M. Joseph, Railway Protection Force Act, 1957, Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 with Section 11, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 with Rule 146.2, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 with Rule 229, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement in Railway Protection Force Neglect of Duty Case Date of the Judgment: 25 November 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 913 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Indu Malhotra, K. M. Joseph Can a High Court, in its writ jurisdiction, overturn a disciplinary authority’s decision of compulsory retirement and order reinstatement with back

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement in Railway Protection Force Neglect of Duty Case: Director General of Police, Railway Protection Force vs. Rajendra Kumar Dubey (25 November 2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top