Supreme Court clarifies the date for possession in housing projects: IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the commencement date for calculating the period for handing over possession of an apartment in a housing project. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: M/s IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand and Others Judgment Date: 21 […]
Supreme Court clarifies the date for possession in housing projects: IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the commencement date for calculating the period for handing over possession of an apartment in a housing project. CASE TYPE: Consumer Case Name: M/s IREO Private Limited vs. Aloke Anand and Others Judgment Date: 21
Supreme Court Upholds Allotment of Commercial Plot: Velagacharla Jayaram Reddy vs. M.Venkata Ramana (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plot of land within a cooperative society layout, designated as a commercial area, can be reclassified as a parking area based on assumptions and without clear demarcation in the layout plan. CASE TYPE: Cooperative Society Dispute Case
Supreme Court on Rights of Subsequent Purchasers in Delayed Housing Projects Date of the Judgment: 22 July 2021 Citation: M/S LAUREATE BUILDWELL PVT. LTD. vs CHARANJEET SINGH, CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7042 of 2019 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Hemant Gupta, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J. (authored the judgment). Can a subsequent purchaser of a flat
Supreme Court clarifies treatment of La Residentia project Date of the Judgment: 29 June 2021 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a real estate project, initially linked to a larger, troubled group, be treated differently if it has made substantial progress? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in the
Supreme Court Declares West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017 Unconstitutional LEGAL ISSUE: Repugnancy between State and Central laws on the Concurrent List CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Real Estate Regulation Case Name: Forum for People’s Collective Efforts (FPCE) & Anr. vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr. Judgment Date: 4 May 2021 Date of
U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad vs. Asha Ram: Supreme Court on Land Acquisition Compensation Date of the Judgment: 23 March 2021 Citation: U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad vs. Asha Ram (D) Thr. Lrs & Ors. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 337 OF 2021 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Hemant Gupta, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can the
Supreme Court Dismisses Plea for Intervention in Real Estate Project: Upendra Choudhury vs. Bulandshahar Development Authority (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court should intervene in a real estate project under Article 32 of the Constitution. CASE TYPE: Real Estate/Constitutional Law Case Name: Upendra Choudhury vs. Bulandshahar Development Authority & Ors [Judgment Date]: 11 February
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on Housing Allotment: U.P. Housing & Development Board vs. Namit Sharma (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person can claim allotment of a plot based on a registration made by their grandfather, especially when the original registration has expired and no allotment was ever made to the grandfather. CASE TYPE:
Supreme Court Upholds Consumer Rights: Imperia Structures Ltd. vs. Anil Patni (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the remedies available to homebuyers under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 are additional to those under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law, Real Estate Law Case Name: M/s Imperia Structures Ltd. vs. Anil Patni
Supreme Court Directs Renewal of Licenses and Payment of Dues in Seth vs. Mittal Contempt Case (2020) Date of the Judgment: 9 October 2020 Citation: 2020 INSC 483 Judges: Ashok Bhushan, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a court compel parties to adhere to a settlement agreement when one party is accused of deliberately obstructing its
Supreme Court Directs Restructuring of Dues and Loan Disbursements in Amrapali Case (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether NBCC can be held liable for disputes and liabilities of Amrapali Group projects, whether the interest rate of 12% imposed on Royalgolf Link City Projects Private Limited was justified, whether the FAR can be returned to Noida and Greater
