Real Estate Law

Supreme Court Upholds Premium Demand for Slum Rehabilitation Scheme: Uttar Bhartiya Rajak Samaj Panchayat vs. State of Maharashtra (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds Premium Demand for Slum Rehabilitation Scheme: Uttar Bhartiya Rajak Samaj Panchayat vs. State of Maharashtra (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a premium can be demanded for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme when the Letter of Intent (LOI) was issued before the premium policy was introduced, but the project was delayed due to pending Coastal […]

Supreme Court Upholds Premium Demand for Slum Rehabilitation Scheme: Uttar Bhartiya Rajak Samaj Panchayat vs. State of Maharashtra (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Ratio in Housing Dispute: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. Parasvanath Developers (2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Ratio in Housing Dispute: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. Parasvanath Developers (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Liability for compensation and refund in a failed real estate project. CASE TYPE: Consumer. Case Name: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. M/s. Parasvanath Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 17 December 2019 Date of the Judgment: 17 December

Supreme Court Upholds Compensation Ratio in Housing Dispute: Chandigarh Housing Board vs. Parasvanath Developers (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Completion of Amrapali Group Projects, Protecting Homebuyers: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2019)

Amrapali Group Homebuyers Win Relief: Supreme Court Orders Project Completion LEGAL ISSUE: Protection of homebuyers’ rights and completion of stalled real estate projects. CASE TYPE: Real Estate/Consumer Law. Case Name: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 23 July 2019 Date of the Judgment: 23 July 2019 Citation: Not Available

Supreme Court Orders Completion of Amrapali Group Projects, Protecting Homebuyers: Bikram Chatterji & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies allotment rights for housing scheme registrants: UP Housing Board vs. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal (2019)

Supreme Court clarifies allotment rights for housing scheme registrants: UP Housing Board vs. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mere registration for a housing scheme guarantees allotment of a plot or house. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: UP Housing and Development Board vs. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal Judgment Date: May 01, 2019 Date of

Supreme Court clarifies allotment rights for housing scheme registrants: UP Housing Board vs. Ramesh Chandra Agarwal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Enforces Agreement for Flat Allotment Despite Payment Dispute: Suman Jindal & Anr. vs. M/s. Adarsh Developers (25 April 2019)

Supreme Court Enforces Agreement for Flat Allotment Despite Payment Dispute: Suman Jindal & Anr. vs. M/s. Adarsh Developers (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a developer can cancel a flat allotment for alleged non-payment of the full booking amount when the parties had agreed to a reduced booking amount. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case Name: Suman Jindal

Supreme Court Enforces Agreement for Flat Allotment Despite Payment Dispute: Suman Jindal & Anr. vs. M/s. Adarsh Developers (25 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘Promoter’ under RERA: Association for Consumer Welfare and Aid vs. Granite Gate Properties (25 March 2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies “Promoter” Definition under RERA: Association for Consumer Welfare and Aid vs. Granite Gate Properties (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification of the definition of “promoter” under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA). CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Association for Consumer Welfare and Aid vs. Granite Gate Properties Private Limited &

Supreme Court clarifies definition of ‘Promoter’ under RERA: Association for Consumer Welfare and Aid vs. Granite Gate Properties (25 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Refund with 9% Interest for Delayed Possession: Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd vs. Devasis Rudra (25 March 2019)

Supreme Court Allows Refund with 9% Interest for Delayed Possession: Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd vs. Devasis Rudra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a homebuyer is entitled to a refund with interest for delayed possession, despite initially seeking possession as the primary relief. CASE TYPE: Consumer Dispute Case Name: Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd

Supreme Court Allows Refund with 9% Interest for Delayed Possession: Kolkata West International City Pvt Ltd vs. Devasis Rudra (25 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Auction for Mumbai Land Dispute: Jaykrishna Industries vs. State of Maharashtra (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government body can privately negotiate the sale of public land after a public auction process has commenced and a change in land use has occurred. CASE TYPE: Civil (Land Auction Dispute) Case Name: Jaykrishna Industries Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra and Others [Judgment Date]: November 13, 2017 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Orders Fresh Auction for Mumbai Land Dispute: Jaykrishna Industries vs. State of Maharashtra (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules Against Builder for Selling Shop Already Booked: Kusum Agarwal vs. Harsha Associates (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Deficiency in service by a builder for selling a property already booked to another customer. CASE TYPE: Consumer Law Case Name: Kusum Agarwal & Anr. vs. M/s Harsha Associates Pvt. Ltd. Judgment Date: 12 October 2017 Can a builder sell a property to someone else after it has already been booked by a

Supreme Court Rules Against Builder for Selling Shop Already Booked: Kusum Agarwal vs. Harsha Associates (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top