Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023)

/ Debt Recovery Tribunals, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, E-filing, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Procedural Law, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993 with Section 36

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mandatory e-filing of pleadings at Debt Recovery Tribunals and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals is justified, considering the digital divide in India. CASE TYPE: Writ Petition (Civil) – Service Law, Technology Law, and Procedural Law Case Name: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-filing at DRTs and DRATs, Addresses Digital Divide Concerns (29 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993, Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act 1993 with Section 36

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mandatory e-filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs) and Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals (DRATs) is valid, considering the digital divide in the country. CASE TYPE: Civil, focused on procedural aspects of debt recovery

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory E-Filing in Debt Recovery Tribunals: M P High Court Bar Association vs. Union of India (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top