Regulations

Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Standards for Ayurveda PG Courses: Central Council for Indian Medicine vs. Karnataka Ayurveda Medical College (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970, Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 with Section 13A, Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 with Section 22, Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 with Section 36, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Post-Graduate Ayurveda Education Regulations, Regulations, Regulations with Minimum Standards

Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Standards for Ayurveda PG Courses: Central Council for Indian Medicine vs. Karnataka Ayurveda Medical College (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether permission granted to an Ayurvedic medical college for a subsequent academic year can retroactively validate admissions for a previous year where the college did not meet the required minimum standards. CASE TYPE: […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Minimum Standards for Ayurveda PG Courses: Central Council for Indian Medicine vs. Karnataka Ayurveda Medical College (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Ph.D. Requirement for Polytechnic Principals: Gelus Ram Sahu vs. Dr. Surendra Kumar Singh (2020)

/ All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987, All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 with 2010 AICTE Regulations, Appointment, B.R. Gavai, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 16, Constitution of India with Article 309, Judges, Qualifications, Regulations, Retrospective Application of Law, S.A. Bobde, Service Law, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Ph.D. Requirement for Polytechnic Principals: Gelus Ram Sahu vs. Dr. Surendra Kumar Singh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Ph.D. degree is mandatory for appointment to the post of Principal in Polytechnic colleges. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Gelus Ram Sahu and others vs. Dr. Surendra Kumar Singh and others Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Clarifies Ph.D. Requirement for Polytechnic Principals: Gelus Ram Sahu vs. Dr. Surendra Kumar Singh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies reservation policy for ship recycling plots: R.K. Industries vs. S.C./S.T. Shipbreakers Association (2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Judges, R.F. Nariman, Regulations, Regulations with Clause 5.4, Reservation Policy, Sanjiv Khanna, Ship Recycling Regulations, Surya Kant

Supreme Court clarifies reservation policy for ship recycling plots: R.K. Industries vs. S.C./S.T. Shipbreakers Association (2019) Date of the Judgment: July 16, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 717 Judges: R. F. Nariman, J., Sanjiv Khanna, J., Surya Kant, J. Can the reservation of plots for Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) for ship recycling be

Supreme Court clarifies reservation policy for ship recycling plots: R.K. Industries vs. S.C./S.T. Shipbreakers Association (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top