Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Primary Teachers: 18-Month D.El.Ed. Not Equivalent to 2-Year Diploma

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Primary Teachers: 18-Month D.El.Ed. Not Equivalent to 2-Year Diploma LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an 18-month Diploma in Elementary Education (D.El.Ed.) obtained through Open and Distance Learning (ODL) from the National Institute of Open Schooling (NIOS) is equivalent to a 2-year D.El.Ed. for the purpose of appointment as Assistant Teachers in primary […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Primary Teachers: 18-Month D.El.Ed. Not Equivalent to 2-Year Diploma Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds 65-60% Cut-off for Assistant Teacher Recruitment Exam: Ram Sharan Maurya vs. State of UP (2020)

Supreme Court Upholds 65-60% Cut-off for Assistant Teacher Recruitment Exam: Ram Sharan Maurya vs. State of UP (2020) Date of the Judgment: 18 November 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 859 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, J. Can a state government increase the minimum qualifying marks for a recruitment exam after the exam has

Supreme Court Upholds 65-60% Cut-off for Assistant Teacher Recruitment Exam: Ram Sharan Maurya vs. State of UP (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Teacher Appointments: Contempt Petition Dismissed in Uttar Pradesh (13 December 2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Appointment Process for Assistant Teachers in Uttar Pradesh Date of the Judgment: 13 December 2019 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and M. R. Shah, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed contempt petitions concerning the appointment of assistant teachers in Uttar Pradesh. The core issue was whether the State had violated previous

Supreme Court Upholds Teacher Appointments: Contempt Petition Dismissed in Uttar Pradesh (13 December 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies teacher eligibility: Rajasthan Recruitment Case (2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Teacher Eligibility: Rajasthan Recruitment Case (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a proviso allowing candidates who have appeared for an exam to apply for a teaching post, despite not having the qualification on the application deadline, remains valid after the main rule it modifies is substituted. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Recruitment) Case Name: The

Supreme Court clarifies teacher eligibility: Rajasthan Recruitment Case (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Invalidates Shiksha Mitra Appointments as Teachers: State of UP vs. Anand Kumar Yadav (25 July 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether unqualified teachers can be appointed for basic education, and whether the State can relax statutory qualifications. CASE TYPE: Education Law, Service Law Case Name: State of U.P. & Anr. vs. Anand Kumar Yadav & Ors. Judgment Date: 25 July 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 25 July 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 683

Supreme Court Invalidates Shiksha Mitra Appointments as Teachers: State of UP vs. Anand Kumar Yadav (25 July 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top