Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Batti (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Batti (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, even if possession has been taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Batti & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 22 March 2023 Date of the Judgment: 22 March 2023 Citation: […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Batti (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reviews Land Acquisition Judgments: Impact of Indore Development Authority Ruling (17 March 2023)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII Rule 1, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Reviews Land Acquisition Judgments Post Indore Development Authority LEGAL ISSUE: Review of judgments related to land acquisition following the overruling of Pune Municipal Corporation by Indore Development Authority. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition, Civil Case Name: Govt. of NCT of Delhi Through the Secretary, Land and Building Department & Another vs. M/s. K.L. Rathi

Supreme Court Reviews Land Acquisition Judgments: Impact of Indore Development Authority Ruling (17 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Ishwarbhai Patel (2023)

/ Consent Award, Deemed Lapse, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, M. R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Ishwarbhai Patel (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 17, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 239 Judges: M. R. Shah, J., Manoj Misra, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the landowner refuses compensation after a consent award? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Ishwarbhai Patel (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Patel (2023)

/ Deemed Lapse of Acquisition, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M. R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Patel (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 17, 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 253 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and Manoj Misra, J. Can a land owner refuse compensation after a consent award and then claim the acquisition has lapsed? The Supreme Court of India addressed

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: State of Gujarat vs. Jayantibhai Patel (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, even if possession has been taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: NCT of Delhi vs. Jai Pal (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Govt. vs. Dayanand (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 12(2), Land Acquisition Law, Land Acquisition Law with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Govt. vs. Dayanand (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken and notice issued to collect compensation. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. vs. Dayanand & Anr. Judgment Date: March 13, 2023 Date

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Govt. vs. Dayanand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land acquisition lapse in Delhi: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land acquisition lapse in Delhi: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the locus standi to challenge the acquisition of said land, and whether the acquisition proceedings are deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on land acquisition lapse in Delhi: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the locus standi to challenge the acquisition of land under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Manjeet Kaur (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Date of the Judgment: March 13, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 229 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities could not take possession

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding deemed lapse of land acquisition. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Land

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Ashok Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Manoj Misra, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation hasn’t been paid, even if possession was taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Union

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Union of India vs. Rajesh Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top