Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Archives

Supreme Court settles land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed (2023)

February 9, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is […]

Supreme Court settles land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Shakeel Ahmed (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023)

February 9, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if physical possession is taken but compensation is not paid, or vice versa. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition by DDA, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023)

February 9, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition by DDA, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if physical possession is taken and compensation is not paid, or vice

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition by DDA, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narvada Devi (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagi Singh and Ors. (20 January 2023)

January 20, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 366 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 1507 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 3379 OF 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities have taken possession of the land but not

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagi Singh and Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority Wins Against Bhagi Singh (20 January 2023)

January 20, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagi Singh: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 66 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities have taken possession but not paid compensation? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority Wins Against Bhagi Singh (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rambir (2023) INSC 40

January 20, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rambir (2023) INSC 40 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not tendered to the original landowners, despite the possession of the land having

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rambir (2023) INSC 40 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is deposited in the Reference

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023)

January 20, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Reference Court, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is deposited in the Reference Court but not directly paid to landowners and if possession is taken by drawing a panchnama. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua and Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles: Subsequent purchasers lack standing to challenge land acquisition lapse in Delhi Development Authority vs. Asha Prakash (20 January 2023)

January 20, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Lapse Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 364 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 1501 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 6082 OF 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a person who buys land after it has been

Supreme Court settles: Subsequent purchasers lack standing to challenge land acquisition lapse in Delhi Development Authority vs. Asha Prakash (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Acquisition Lapse (20 January 2023)

January 20, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Acquisition Lapse LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land has the right to challenge the acquisition of that land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, claiming it has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Supreme Court on Land Acquisition: Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Challenge Acquisition Lapse (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (20 January 2023)

January 20, 2023 / C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not tendered to a person claiming a share in the land, particularly when possession has been taken and the claimant’s ownership is not established. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (20 January 2023)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi: Supreme Court on Land Acquisition Lapse LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shakuntla Devi (20 January 2023) Read Post »