Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court clarifies review jurisdiction in land acquisition cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. K.L. Rathi Steel S Limited (2024) INSC 454 (17 May 2024)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, Code of Civil Procedure with Order XLVII, Code of Civil Procedure with Section 114, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 137, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Jurisdiction in Land Acquisition Cases Date of the Judgment: 17 May 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 454 Judges: Hon’ble Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta, and Ujjal Bhuyan Can a judgment be reviewed simply because a previous legal precedent it relied on was later overruled? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this […]

Supreme Court clarifies review jurisdiction in land acquisition cases: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. K.L. Rathi Steel S Limited (2024) INSC 454 (17 May 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh (2023)

/ Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Limitation Act, 1963, Limitation Act, 1963 with Section 5, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding the lapse of land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs.

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Jagan Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 475 (18 May 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court settles the Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 475 (18 May 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can invoke Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land

Supreme Court settles the Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 475 (18 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition rights of subsequent purchasers: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 558 (18 May 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court on Locus Standi of Subsequent Purchasers in Land Acquisition Cases LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can invoke Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 to claim that the acquisition has lapsed. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Government of

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition rights of subsequent purchasers: Government of NCT of Delhi vs. Ravinder Kumar Jain & Ors. (2023) INSC 558 (18 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the locus standi of subsequent purchasers in land acquisition cases: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain (2023) INSC 432 (4 May 2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Judges, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain: Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Date of the Judgment: 4 May 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 432 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. Can a subsequent purchaser of land challenge its acquisition? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question, overturning a

Supreme Court settles the locus standi of subsequent purchasers in land acquisition cases: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain (2023) INSC 432 (4 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse for Subsequent Purchasers: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse for Subsequent Purchasers: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can challenge acquisition proceedings and claim a lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

Supreme Court Overturns High Court on Land Acquisition Lapse for Subsequent Purchasers: Delhi Development Authority vs. Narendra Kumar Jain (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases for Fresh Review: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 101-A, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisitions lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if compensation isn’t paid and possession is not taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The State

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases for Fresh Review: State of Haryana vs. Hira Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Compensation, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30/31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Possession, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if either possession is taken or compensation is paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 30/31, Rajesh Bindal, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if either possession is taken or compensation is paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Anita Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Govt. of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Deemed Lapse of Acquisition, Judges, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken but compensation is not paid. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Govt. of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Govt. of NCT Delhi vs. Dinesh Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shiv Raj & Ors. (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Judges, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shiv Raj & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition. Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shiv Raj & Ors. Judgment Date: April 19, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: April

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shiv Raj & Ors. (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top