Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Law, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Reference Court, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is deposited in the Reference Court but not directly paid to landowners and if possession is taken by drawing a panchnama. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua and Ors. [Judgment […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is deposited in the Reference

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajesh Dua (2023) INSC 28 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rambir (2023) INSC 40

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rambir (2023) INSC 40 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not tendered to the original landowners, despite the possession of the land having

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rambir (2023) INSC 40 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority Wins Against Bhagi Singh (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagi Singh: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 66 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a land acquisition be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities have taken possession but not paid compensation? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority Wins Against Bhagi Singh (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagi Singh and Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 366 of 2023 (@ SLP (C) NO. 1507 OF 2023) (@ DIARY NO. 3379 OF 2022) Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can land acquisition proceedings be deemed to have lapsed if the authorities have taken possession of the land but not

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagi Singh and Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (20 January 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not tendered to a person claiming a share in the land, particularly when possession has been taken and the claimant’s ownership is not established. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Shyamo & Ors. (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overruling High Court: Delhi Development Authority vs. Eminent Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Eminent Marketing Pvt. Ltd.: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid to the landowner, despite possession being taken by the authorities. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Eminent Marketing Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 16 January

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overruling High Court: Delhi Development Authority vs. Eminent Marketing Pvt. Ltd. (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Locus Standi, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta: Supreme Court Upholds Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if possession is taken, but compensation is not paid, and whether a subsequent purchaser has the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapse Claim: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can challenge the acquisition of that land under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsing Claim by Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Beena Gupta (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Possession Valid Despite Non-Tender of Compensation (15 December 2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 34, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Possession Valid Despite Non-Tender of Compensation LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition can be deemed to have lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if possession has been taken but compensation has not been tendered. CASE TYPE: Land

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Possession Valid Despite Non-Tender of Compensation (15 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Mohd. Maqbool (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Mohd. Maqbool (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not tendered, even if possession has been

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overrules High Court on Lapse: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Mohd. Maqbool (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overruling High Court: Govt of NCT of Delhi vs. Ram Prakash Sehrawat (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 12(2), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), S. Ravindra Bhat

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overruling High Court: Govt of NCT of Delhi vs. Ram Prakash Sehrawat (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Overruling High Court: Govt of NCT of Delhi vs. Ram Prakash Sehrawat (2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top