Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Denies Relief to Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Locus Standi, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Subsequent Purchaser

Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can claim the acquisition has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini […]

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Denies Relief to Subsequent Purchaser: Delhi Development Authority vs. Damini Wadhwa (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022)

/ Judges, Land Acquisition Law, Lapse of Land Acquisition, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Payment of Compensation, Possession of Land, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Clarifies Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding the lapse of land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Law Case

Supreme Court clarifies land acquisition lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhagwat Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsed Claims Under 2013 Act

/ Judges, Krishna Murari, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsed Claims Under 2013 Act LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 regarding lapse of land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority v. Shiv Kumar and others; Government of

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition, Rejects Lapsed Claims Under 2013 Act Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Sunil Khatri (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Sunil Khatri (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if possession was not taken due to court orders. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: DDA vs. Sunil Khatri (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority Wins Against Godfrey Phillips (I) Ltd. & Ors. (06 May 2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 16, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Delhi Development Authority vs. Godfrey Phillips (I) Ltd. & Ors.: Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Date of the Judgment: 06 May 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 3073 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 23418 of 2017) Judges: Hemant Gupta, J. and V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a subsequent purchaser of land claim that the

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority Wins Against Godfrey Phillips (I) Ltd. & Ors. (06 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Administration vs. Pawan Kumar (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 31(1), Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Administration vs. Pawan Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a subsequent purchaser of land can claim lapse of acquisition proceedings under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, and whether deposit of compensation in court amounts to payment. CASE

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Delhi Administration vs. Pawan Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles land acquisition dispute: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhim Sain Goel (2022)

/ Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Law, National Highways Act, 1956, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court settles land acquisition dispute: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhim Sain Goel (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a land acquisition proceeding lapses under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, if the acquiring authority was prevented from taking possession due to court orders obtained

Supreme Court settles land acquisition dispute: Delhi Development Authority vs. Bhim Sain Goel (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: APMC vs. State of Karnataka (22 March 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 17(4), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4(1), Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 6, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: APMC vs. State of Karnataka (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisitions had lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: The Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Bangalore vs. The State of Karnataka

Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Case: APMC vs. State of Karnataka (22 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Haryana vs. Sunder Lal (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Section 4, M.R. Shah, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), Taking Possession

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Haryana vs. Sunder Lal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether possession of land was legally taken by the State after the award was passed in land acquisition proceedings. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: State of Haryana & Ors. vs. Sunder Lal [Judgment Date]: July 22, 2019 Date of the Judgment: July

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Haryana vs. Sunder Lal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses DDA Appeal, Grants Time for Fresh Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh Chauhan (2017)

/ A. M. Khanwilkar, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 11, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Delhi Development Authority’s (DDA) appeal regarding land acquisition should be allowed. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh Chauhan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 13th February 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13th February 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 2690 of 2017 (Arising out of Special Leave

Supreme Court Dismisses DDA Appeal, Grants Time for Fresh Land Acquisition: Delhi Development Authority vs. Rajender Singh Chauhan (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Lapses Land Acquisition for Non-Payment of Compensation: Malik Industry vs. State of Haryana (2017)

/ Amitava Roy, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 with Section 24(2)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid to landowners, but only deposited with the Land Acquisition Collector. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Malik Industry & Anr. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 12 December 2017 Date of the Judgment: 12 December 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 713 Judges:

Supreme Court Lapses Land Acquisition for Non-Payment of Compensation: Malik Industry vs. State of Haryana (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top